ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Review

Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg?

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
* Equal contributors
PUBLISHED 31 Dec 2018
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

Abstract

Ticks are responsible for transmission of multiple bacterial, parasitic and viral diseases. Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) occur particularly in tropical and also subtropical areas. The frequency of these TBDs has been increasing and extending to new territories in a significant way, partly since ticks’ populations are highly favored by prevailing factors such as change in land use patterns, and climate change. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate estimates of mortality, premature mortality, and disability associated about TBDs, more molecular and epidemiological studies in different regions of the world, including Latin America, are required. In the case of this region, there is still a limited number of published studies. In addition, there is recently the emergence and discovering of pathogens not reported previously in this region but present in other areas of the world. In this article we discuss some studies and implications about TBDs in Latin America, most of them, zoonotic and with evolving taxonomical issues.

Keywords

Tick-borne disease, zoonoses, Anaplasma, Babesia, Borrelia, Ehrlichia, Rickettsia, epidemiology, public health

Over the past decades there have been significant achievements in the understanding of tick borne diseases (TBDs), which are mostly zoonoses and classed as neglected diseases15. Their occurrence is significant in tropical and subtropical areas, leading to an important impact on public health as well as the economy, as they affect humans, domestic animals and livestock, among others6. Knowledge of the occurrence of these diseases in animal species is of utmost importance for the understanding of the risk for human infection7. Ticks, and animals, including human beings, interact with nature, and their environmental and ecological interactions regulate the populations of ticks and vertebrates, determining their contact rates and the circulation of the diseases8. Moreover, although most TBDs are tick-borne, other ways of transmission can occur. For instance, bovine anaplasmosis, caused by Anaplasma marginale, can be spread through mechanical means, e.g. biting arthropods or by contaminated fomites, like needles, ear tagging, dehorning and castration equipment9. A. marginale can be also transmitted transplacentally, which has contributed to the occurrence of bovine anaplasmosis in some areas10.

In Latin America, there is a lack of studies about TBDs. However, data from Panama, Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Colombia, and Venezuela clearly show that these pathogens are prevalent when they are assessed. Recently, two lethal cases of rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia rickettsii were reported in rural and urban of Panama, probably transmitted by the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l., accounting for the first molecular detection of this bacteria in this tick in Panama and Central America11. TBDs caused by rickettsial species are life-threatening infections that in the tropical Americas have an emerging and reemerging trend. Until some years ago, R. rickettsia was the only tick-borne species of rickettsia present in Latin America. Nowadays, multiple other species, such as R. parkeri and R. massiliae, are causing infections in humans in this region. In Peru, different ectoparasite samples have tested positive for a Rickettsia genus-specific qPCR, with strong evidence that active searching of TBDs etiological agents is required in order to improve reporting and detection12. Additional, new species are being reported; although their pathogenicity has not been definitely confirmed, they should be considered as potential pathogens13.

Ehrlichiosis is another TBD caused by rickettsial organisms of the genus Ehrlichia14,15. Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by Ehrlichia canis apparently is highly endemic in Brazil and has been also detected in Mexico, where it is closely related to strains from the USA14. In Brazil, E. canis is the principal Ehrlichia specie found in canines and has been also detected in felines, although the prevalence has not been estimated yet. In addition, in Brazil, E. ewingii has been recently detected, as well as E. chaffeensis in marsh deers, and there is immune-epidemiological evidence that suggests the occurrence of ehrlichiosis in humans16,17, but its etiologic agent has not yet been established. Improved molecular diagnostic resources for laboratory testing will allow better identification and characterization of ehrlichial organisms associated with human ehrlichiosis in Brazil16.

In Colombia, three outbreaks of human rickettsiosis have been reported in the Northwestern region during 2006–2008, with a lethality up to 54%18. And later, in 2010–2011 a cross-sectional study revealed the presence of three different Rickettsia species: R. felis in fleas, and R. bellii and Rickettsia sp. strain Atlantic rainforest, both in Amblyomma ovale ticks18. Additionally, in Venezuela, detection of Anaplasma platys has been described in humans. Those patients were bitten by Rhipicephalus sanguineus and suffered chronic non-specific clinical signs, including headaches and muscle pains, supporting A. platys as a zoonotic tick-borne pathogen19. Other studies from Venezuela have found a high proportion of positivity of antibodies against Babesia caballi and Theileria equi in horses and other animals20, suggesting that probably the real frequency and importance of these hemoparasites are overlooked.

Babesiosis is caused by any of a group of vector-borne, protozoal hemoparasites of the phylum Apicomplexa. There are more than 110 described Babesia spp. worldwide, identified from mammalian and also avian hosts21,22. This group of TBDs is transmitted by ixodid ticks and they infect a wide variety of vertebrates that maintain transmission cycles. Till today, there are multiple species of the genus Babesia that can infect people, and the regional distribution of Babesia microti is the most prevalent. In the USA, babesiosis is caused primarily by B. microti, whereas cases in European countries are commonly caused by B. divergens22. In countries such as the USA its incidence has increased 260% between 2005–201023, with a proportion of 40% of cases of Lyme disease reporting co-infections with Babesia. In Latin American countries, particularly Colombia, the seroprevalence of Babesia has been reported has high as 30% from people of urban and rural locations24. Additionally, recently, new Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato strains or new related species have been described in countries such as Uruguay, Brazil and Chile25.

In the USA, some authors suggest that approximately 95% of ~50 thousand cases of locally acquired vector-borne diseases in humans reported annually to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are caused by organisms that were vectorized by ticks (Table 1)6,26. Beyond the Americas, in other regions of the world, like in Europe, ticks are the main vectors of animal and human organisms. Ticks transmit several viral agents, called tick-borne viruses (TBV), such as tick-borne encephalitis virus and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, which have reemerged in multiple areas of the world27. TBV have a natural cycle between ticks and wild animals in nature, with humans as accidental hosts27,28. Emerging TBVs are continually discovered, probably related to the increase of tick populations in different regions of the planet and invasion of human beings into areas infested by ticks27,28.

Table 1. Examples of selected tick-borne diseases in Latin America.

Modified from Eisen et al.6.

DiseaseEtiological agent(s)Primary vector(s)
Anaplasmosis Anaplasma phagocytophilum Ixodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus
Anaplasma platysRhipicephalus sanguineus
Babesiosis Babesia microti Ixodes scapularis
Babesia canisRhipicephalus sanguineus
Babesia bovis Rhipicephalus microplus
Babesia bigeminaRhipicephalus annulatus
Borrelia miyamotoi disease Borrelia miyamotoiIxodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus
Colorado tick fever Colorado tick fever virus (coltivirus) Dermacentor andersoni
Ehrlichiosis Ehrlichia muris eauclairensisIxodes scapularis
Ehrlichia chaffeensisAmblyomma americanum
Ehrlichia ewingiiAmblyomma americanum
Heartland virus disease Heartland virus (phlebovirus) Amblyomma americanum
Lyme disease Borrelia burgdorferiIxodes scapularis, Ixodes pacificus
Borrelia mayoniiIxodes scapularis
Powassan encephalitis Powassan virus (flavivirus) Ixodes scapularis
Rickettsia parkeri
rickettsiosis
Rickettsia parkeriAmblyomma maculatum
Rocky Mountain spotted
fever
Rickettsia rickettsiiDermacentor variabilis, Dermacentor andersoni,
Rhipicephalus sanguineus s. l.
Pacific Coast tick fever Rickettsia philipiiDermacentor occidentalis
Tularemia Francisella tularensisAmblyomma americanum Dermacentor variabilis
Dermacentor andersoni

Detection and sentinel surveillance of TBD require molecular tools for diagnosis29, for example, serological tests have proven to be inconclusive in diagnose Lyme disease30. The use of molecular biology tests in recent years has increased the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of infections in the group of Rickettsiales. Molecular diagnosis enables the accurate identification not only at genus level, but species, providing additional characterization on the epidemiology and the evolution of clinical disease. Furthermore, PCR as well enzyme restriction tests of the vector blood meal can be employed to analyze their feeding source and possibly identify the ecological reservoir of the organisms31. Etiological agents of the group of Rickettsial, including those in the genuses Anaplasma, Neorickettsia, Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia, are relevant and often vector-borne organisms of canines and felines, but also of bovine, livestock and other animals, which appears to be a wide range of hosts10,32.

Conclusions

Besides the limited number of studies in Latin America on TBDs, the prevalence of these diseases is increasing, triggered by globalization, as well the impact climate change and variability. Tick and TBDs investigators, vet doctors, medical and public health practitioners should work to share their expertise on different aspects of TBDs, such as tick ecology, disease transmission, diagnostics, and treatment, in order to face the challenges of scientific, political, and public engagement for TBD research and control in this region33. Systematic reviews as well as observational analyses are necessary in order to understand the current situation of TBDs. Molecular tools can provide valuable information for understanding the evolution of their etiological agents, as well as provide insights into host-pathogen-vector-environment interactions. Probably, what we have seen till now is just the tip of an iceberg and there is a need for more studies in Latin America about TBDs.

Data availability

No data is associated with this article.

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Feb 2019
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 31 Dec 2018
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Author Response 07 Jan 2019
    Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, 660003, Colombia
    07 Jan 2019
    Author Response
    Dear Sergio,

    First of all, thanks for your valuable comments as an expert in ticks and tick-borne diseases. Secondly, you probably are not fully aware of the article types of F1000Research. ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 04 Jan 2019
    Sergio Bermúdez Castillero, Gorgas Memorial Institute for Health Studies, Panama
    04 Jan 2019
    Reader Comment
    The paper "Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg?" presents a premise that has been discussed by numerous articles in the ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Idarraga-Bedoya SE et al. Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg? [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1988 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17649.1)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 31 Dec 2018
Views
25
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Jan 2019
Joyce M Sakamoto, Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 25
This manuscript entitled "Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg?" suggests that more studies on TTBD (ticks and tick-borne diseases) are needed worldwide, and particularly in Latin America, but there is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sakamoto JM. Reviewer Report For: Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg? [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1988 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.19300.r42313)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 04 Feb 2019
    Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, 660003, Colombia
    04 Feb 2019
    Author Response
    Dear Dr. Sakamoto

    Thanks for your valuable comments. We want to answer all your comments, as we improved significantly our manuscript based on yours as well as on the other reviewer.

    This ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 04 Feb 2019
    Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, 660003, Colombia
    04 Feb 2019
    Author Response
    Dear Dr. Sakamoto

    Thanks for your valuable comments. We want to answer all your comments, as we improved significantly our manuscript based on yours as well as on the other reviewer.

    This ... Continue reading
Views
37
Cite
Reviewer Report 30 Jan 2019
Lidia Chitimia-Dobler, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Munich, Germany 
Not Approved
VIEWS 37
Title and content of this work do not fit together.

What about the taxonomical issues stated at the end of the abstract? It is not discussed in the paper.

For a review, it is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Chitimia-Dobler L. Reviewer Report For: Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg? [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7:1988 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.19300.r42312)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 04 Feb 2019
    Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, 660003, Colombia
    04 Feb 2019
    Author Response
    Dear Dr. Chitima-Dobler

    Thanks for your valuable comments. We want to answer all your comments, as we improved significantly our manuscript based on yours as well as on the other reviewer.

    Title ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 04 Feb 2019
    Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, 660003, Colombia
    04 Feb 2019
    Author Response
    Dear Dr. Chitima-Dobler

    Thanks for your valuable comments. We want to answer all your comments, as we improved significantly our manuscript based on yours as well as on the other reviewer.

    Title ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (2)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 11 Feb 2019
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 31 Dec 2018
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Author Response 07 Jan 2019
    Alfonso Rodriguez-Morales, Public Health and Infection Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, 660003, Colombia
    07 Jan 2019
    Author Response
    Dear Sergio,

    First of all, thanks for your valuable comments as an expert in ticks and tick-borne diseases. Secondly, you probably are not fully aware of the article types of F1000Research. ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 04 Jan 2019
    Sergio Bermúdez Castillero, Gorgas Memorial Institute for Health Studies, Panama
    04 Jan 2019
    Reader Comment
    The paper "Epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne diseases in Latin America: Are we just seeing the tip of the iceberg?" presents a premise that has been discussed by numerous articles in the ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.