ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Case Report
Revised

Case Report: Massive epistaxis from juvenile angiofibroma in an adolescent with severe haemophilia A

[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
PUBLISHED 04 Oct 2019
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Epistaxis may be profuse in individuals with normal bleeding parameters, but in an individual with haemophilia, it may be life-threatening. It is even more dangerous when epistaxis is caused by an undetected concomitant juvenile angiofibroma, and only one such case has been reported in the English literature. We report another case, of an 18-year-old Filipino adolescent with severe haemophilia A who was referred for repeated massive epistaxis. The epistaxis had been attributed to his haemophilia and managed with nasal packing, multiple blood transfusions and Factor VIII administration. After two years of unsuccessful management, nasal endoscopy was performed for the first time, revealing an intranasal mass. Imaging showed a right intranasal vascular tumour supplied mainly by the right sphenopalatine artery. He subsequently underwent preoperative embolization and endoscopic excision of the tumour with Factor VIII transfused pre-, intra-, and post-operatively, and recombinant Factor VII added post-operatively. Final histopathology was consistent with juvenile angiofibroma. There has been no nasal obstruction or recurrence of epistaxis seven years since the surgery. Clinicians should be more meticulous in assessing epistaxis in any patient with a bleeding disorder and investigate more subtle symptoms such as nasal obstruction. Verification of the source by direct visualization and ancillary diagnostic techniques (such as imaging) when indicated should be the standard of care for all patients presenting with epistaxis, whether or not a concomitant bleeding disorder exists. A high index of suspicion for juvenile angiofibroma should be maintained in adolescent males with epistaxis and nasal obstruction.

Keywords

epistaxis, juvenile angiofibroma, haemophilia a, male adolescents, nasal endoscopy, nasal surgical procedures, computed tomography angiography

Revised Amendments from Version 1

1. In response to Reviewer 3 (to emphasise that the prolonged hospitalisation was due to pre-operative problems), the Case presentation has added the statement "Post-operative recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged within a week of surgery (after two months in hospital).

2. Following the recommendations of Reviewer 1, the statement "On the other hand, epistaxis guidelines(6) do recommend 'anterior rhinoscopy with headlight following nasal decongestion' escalating to 'rigid endoscopy or microscopy … where anterior rhinoscopy fails to identify a bleeding point.' " was added to the Discussion, for which an additional reference (6) was cited:

National ENT Trainee Research Network. The British Rhinological Society multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the hospital management of epistaxis. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(12):1142-1156. 10.1017/S0022215117002018.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Alberto Maria Saibene
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Robert G. Berkowitz
See the authors' detailed response to the review by J. Paul Moxham

Introduction

Juvenile angiofibroma (JA) is a benign vascular tumour accounting for 0.5% of all head and neck neoplasms1. It occurs almost exclusively in adolescent males nine to 19-years-old, with a mean age at diagnosis of 15 years2. The clinical presentation involves unilateral epistaxis, nasal obstruction, and an intranasal mass. Epistaxis may be profuse and require nasal packing, vasopressors, antifibrinolytics and transfusions, even in individuals with normal bleeding parameters. However, with haemophilia, such epistaxis is more difficult to control and can be life-threatening. To our knowledge, only one case of JA in a haemophiliac has been reported in the English literature3. We report another case here.

Case presentation

An 18-year-old male Filipino adolescent was referred to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Philippine General Hospital for recurrent epistaxis. Previously diagnosed with severe haemophilia A at age 16, he initially presented with recurrent right nasal congestion and an episode of predominantly right-sided epistaxis described as sudden and profuse, amounting to 1500 ml. At that time, he was admitted to a provincial hospital and received blood and cryoprecipitate transfusions. Following discharge, epistaxis of 100 ml recurred almost daily, requiring nasal packs, repeated hospitalizations of one to two weeks in duration, and transfusions. Cryoprecipitate was often used to control the bleeding since plasma-derived Factor VIII (pFVIII) was seldom available due to shortage of supply and cost. His past history also included hemarthroses and gum bleeding since early childhood, but his symptoms were initially ignored and later only attributed to haemophilia although nasal congestion gradually progressed to obstruction.

After two years of such management, nasal endoscopy performed for the first time by a visiting otorhinolaryngologist revealed a right intranasal mass. He was referred to our institution and admitted with an impression of JA (Radkowski IA) and severe haemophilia A. Following admission, he suffered from hypovolemic shock several times due to difficulty in acquiring blood, cryoprecipitate and Factor VIII. With previous Factor VIII Assay levels less than 1%, 1900 units of Factor VIII concentrate were empirically administered (calculated by weight) to raise levels to normal. His condition was compounded by development of Factor VIII antibodies because of previous, repeated cryoprecipitate transfusions in a suboptimal health-care setting. Although his baseline inhibitor titre had been negative, the preoperative inhibitor titre following multiple transfusions with various blood products was positive 3.5 Bethesda units (BU), necessitating pre-, intra- and post-operative transfusion with recombinant Factor VII (rFVIIa) in addition to higher doses of Factor VIII. Unfortunately, rFVIIa only became available post-operatively.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans showed a hyperdense right intranasal mass corroborated by preoperative embolization angiography as an intranasal vascular tumour supplied by the right sphenopalatine artery and internal maxillary artery (IMA) (Figure 1A and 1B). The vast majority (90%) of the blood supply arose from distal sphenopalatine branches of the right IMA, while the remaining 10% came from both ascending pharyngeal arteries (Figure 1B).

3364b815-738e-4727-a73f-4e9d78033989_figure1.gif

Figure 1.

A. CECT Scan showing enhancing nasopharyngeal mass (asterisk) and B. Angiography showing vascular tumour (asterisk) supplied by sphenopalatine (black arrowhead) and internal maxillary (white arrowhead) arteries. Adobe Photoshop CC 20.01 release was used to erase identifying patient details, remove pixelated areas from black background, and enhance contrast to sharpen image (applied to entire image).

Within 24 hours post-embolization, the patient underwent endoscopic surgery under general endotracheal anaesthesia with Sevoflurane. Factor VIII was given before, during, and after surgery, with recombinant Factor VII added post-operatively. Intraoperatively, a fleshy, vascular 4.7 × 3.2 × 2.7 cm mass was seen arising from the right sphenopalatine foramen. The sphenopalatine artery was cauterized and ligated, and the mass was delivered trans-orally (Figure 2A and 2B). Intraoperative blood loss was 300cc and post-operative bleeding was negligible. In total, the patient received 39,500 units of commercially available pFVIII, 24 mg of rFVIIa, 22 units of packed red blood cells (PRBC), 301 units of cryoprecipitate, 1 unit of whole blood and 3 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Final haematoxylin-eosin stained histopathology findings showed endothelium-lined capillaries with absent smooth muscle cells in a fibrous stroma, consistent with JA. Post-operative recovery was uneventful and the patient was discharged within a week of surgery (after two months in hospital). He has followed up regularly, with no evidence of tumour on nasal endoscopy and no recurrence of nasal obstruction or epistaxis reported by the patient for seven years. He has completed a vocational course at college and is well. Figure 3 summarizes the timeline.

3364b815-738e-4727-a73f-4e9d78033989_figure2.gif

Figure 2.

A. Intraoperative endoscopic view of the sphenopalatine artery (black arrowhead) supplying the mass (black asterisk) and B. Gross specimen measuring 4.7 × 3.2 × 2.7 cm. Adobe Photoshop CC 20.01 release was used to erase identifying patient details and sharpen the image (applied to entire image 2B).

3364b815-738e-4727-a73f-4e9d78033989_figure3.gif

Figure 3. Timeline summarising important information from the case presentation.

Discussion

To our knowledge, there is only one previous case of JA and concomitant haemophilia in the English literature, twice reported by Ozturk et al. in 19993 and by Celiker et al. in 20044. In their case, the preliminary diagnosis of JA was confirmed by biopsy at a different medical centre, where massive haemorrhage jeopardized the patient’s life. On referral to their institution, preoperative embolization, surgical excision, and adequate Factor VIII replacement saved the patient4.

Similarly, significant risk to our patient’s life was posed by delayed diagnosis from hasty attribution of epistaxis to haemophilia alone, and not the possibility of a vascular tumour such as JA. Per haemophilia management guidelines, the long history of “spontaneous bleeding into joints or muscles” in our patient corresponded to the baseline Factor VIII assay clotting factor level of “<1 IU/dL or <1% of normal” seen in severe haemophilia5. While recent-onset of bleeding from “mucous membranes in the mouth, gums, nose, and genitourinary tract” was serious, massive bleeding with “neck/throat” involvement was “life-threatening.” This degree of epistaxis should not have been expected in patients with haemophilia A alone, where major bleeding from these areas only occurs 5–10% of the time5. Moreover, the symptom of nasal obstruction was long-overlooked. Unfortunately, two full years passed before the underlying tumour was discovered.

Current haemophilia guidelines5 advise otolaryngologist referral only for “persistent or recurrent” epistaxis, but the emphasis in this recommendation is for control of bleeding only and not to investigate a different underlying cause such as JA. On the other hand, epistaxis guidelines6 do recommend “anterior rhinoscopy with headlight following nasal decongestion” escalating to “rigid endoscopy or microscopy … where anterior rhinoscopy fails to identify a bleeding point.” Our experience demonstrates that vascular lesions causing epistaxis may remain undetected when presumptively attributed to pre-existing bleeding disorders and are likely to remain undetected unless sought.

In conclusion, although haemophilia guidelines do not mention vascular lesions such as JA, a high index of suspicion should be maintained in adolescent males with epistaxis and nasal obstruction. Per epistaxis guidelines, clinicians should carefully assess the cause of epistaxis in any patient with a bleeding disorder, and direct visualization of the source should be attempted (and verified by ancillary diagnostic techniques such as imaging when indicated) in all patients with epistaxis, regardless of the presence of a concomitant bleeding disorder.

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional data are required.

Consent

Written informed consent for publication of his clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 05 Sep 2019
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Lapeña JFF and Mejia OAD. Case Report: Massive epistaxis from juvenile angiofibroma in an adolescent with severe haemophilia A [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:1593 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20147.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 05 Sep 2019
Views
12
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Sep 2019
Robert G. Berkowitz, Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia 
Approved
VIEWS 12
The authors report a case of juvenile angiofibroma (JA) occurring in a patient with haemophilia, where severe epistaxes were ascribed to the bleeding disorder and no underlying cause was sought for a period of two years.  Following transfer to the author's institution, the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Berkowitz RG. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Massive epistaxis from juvenile angiofibroma in an adolescent with severe haemophilia A [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:1593 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.22132.r53497)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 02 Oct 2019
    Jose Florencio Lapeña, Otorhinolaryngology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila, 1000, Philippines
    02 Oct 2019
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for his kind review and for raising minor (but important) points for consideration:

    1. "It is implied, but not actually stated, that during the two year period ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 02 Oct 2019
    Jose Florencio Lapeña, Otorhinolaryngology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila, 1000, Philippines
    02 Oct 2019
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for his kind review and for raising minor (but important) points for consideration:

    1. "It is implied, but not actually stated, that during the two year period ... Continue reading
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 23 Sep 2019
J. Paul Moxham, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 
Approved
VIEWS 11
This is an excellent and well written case report about a young adult with a hematologic disorder and a coexisting angiofibroma. It delves into the difficulties this case presents to the treating surgeon, reviews the relevant literature (of which there is ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Moxham JP. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Massive epistaxis from juvenile angiofibroma in an adolescent with severe haemophilia A [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:1593 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.22132.r53498)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 02 Oct 2019
    Jose Florencio Lapeña, Otorhinolaryngology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila, 1000, Philippines
    02 Oct 2019
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for his clear and concise review, recapitulating the main theme and "take-home" message of our case report "that just because someone has a bleeding disorder does not ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 02 Oct 2019
    Jose Florencio Lapeña, Otorhinolaryngology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila, 1000, Philippines
    02 Oct 2019
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for his clear and concise review, recapitulating the main theme and "take-home" message of our case report "that just because someone has a bleeding disorder does not ... Continue reading
Views
16
Cite
Reviewer Report 09 Sep 2019
Alberto Maria Saibene, Department of Otolaryngology, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy 
Approved
VIEWS 16
The Authors present a compelling case report where the concomitance of a rare sinonasal vascular tumour, i.e. a juvenile angiofibroma, and haemophilia A delayed diagnosis and complicated clinical management. As the authors correctly demonstrate in the report, a sub-optimal healthcare ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Saibene AM. Reviewer Report For: Case Report: Massive epistaxis from juvenile angiofibroma in an adolescent with severe haemophilia A [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2019, 8:1593 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.22132.r53496)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 02 Oct 2019
    Jose Florencio Lapeña, Otorhinolaryngology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila, 1000, Philippines
    02 Oct 2019
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for his excellent review and valuable comments and recommendations: 

    1. "First of all, it might be worth mentioning that in good rhinologic practice, performing sinonasal tumors biopsies without ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 02 Oct 2019
    Jose Florencio Lapeña, Otorhinolaryngology, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Ermita, Manila, 1000, Philippines
    02 Oct 2019
    Author Response
    We thank the reviewer for his excellent review and valuable comments and recommendations: 

    1. "First of all, it might be worth mentioning that in good rhinologic practice, performing sinonasal tumors biopsies without ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 05 Sep 2019
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.