Australian state influenza notifications and school closures in 2019

Introduction

In 2009, the United Kingdom experienced a summer influenza pandemic, with the National Health Service resorting to pharmacy dispensed oseltamivir to slow the growth. However, when schools closed in August for the six-week summer break, the epidemic dropped to almost zero within a few weeks¹. This was an extreme example of an association that has been documented in other countries, though generally for shorter closures^2–4. A 2013 review of both deliberate and non-deliberate school closures concluded that even without co-interventions, closure of schools could reduce flu transmission during an outbreak^3,5.

The association of school closure and influenza rates has been only sparsely documented in Australia, partly because school holidays generally fall outside the peak influenza period. However, 2019 saw an early epidemic of influenza in Australia with rates around five times normal for the May-July period, with consequent hospitalisation and deaths also increased. Because of the early high rates, winter influenza in 2019 also coincided with the mid-year school breaks, which appeared to be associated with a dip in influenza incidence.

To explore any relationship between the holiday school closure and influenza cases, we examined the relationship between changes in influenza incidence with the school closure dates in 2019 using the different holiday dates that apply in the Australian states and territories.

Methods

Results

Figure 1 shows the rates of influenza for the included states and territory. Figures for each individual state or territory are provided in Appendix 3, Extended data¹⁶.

Figure 1. Rates of influenza for the included Australian states and territory (boxes show school holidays periods).

NSW, New South Wales; QLD, Queensland; WA, Western Australia; ACT, Australian Capital Territory; VIC, Victoria; SA, Southern Australia.

The estimates for the initial effect and the subsequent slopes (Table 1) show significant declines for all states except South Australia, which had already passed its peak by the time of the school holidays (Appendix 3, Extended data)¹⁶. The models showed acceptable goodness-of-fit (Appendix 4, Extended data)¹⁶ with Pearson’s Chi-square tests all indicating insufficient evidence of lack of fit (P>0.05).

For the analysis of changes in weekly influenza counts from the previous week (as described in the statistical methods section, third paragraph) for all states combined, there were 19 (33%) decreases pre-vacation; 11 (92%) decreases during the vacation; and 19 (59%) decreases post-vacation (P=0.0002).

The data on influenza rates by age group (Figure 2) show the first decline during school holidays is seen in the school aged (5–19 years) population, with the decline in the adult (20–64 years) population being smaller and following a further week later, and with even smaller and delayed drops in the infant (1–4) and elderly (65+ years) age groups. We did not have access to the state specific age bands, and hence have indicated the school closure dates with the largest population groups.

Figure 2. Influenza reports by age group (boxes show school holidays periods).

Discussion

The 2019 Australia influenza notification data show a significant association between school holidays and declines in influenza incidence in most states in Australia. We also found the earliest and largest declines in influenza incidence were in the school aged group (5–19 years), with still later and smaller declines in the adult group (20–64), and least impact on the preschool and over 65’s.

Our findings are consistent with previous reports³ of school closure for both usual holiday periods and emergency closure for epidemics.

The size of the declines is also consistent with those predicted by models of transmission for school closures¹⁸. Some states experienced a rebound within weeks of school restarting whereas others saw a continued decline. We do not have a simple explanation for this difference.

The association of school closure with declines in influenza has several potential explanations besides a causal effect. First, cases of influenza might be underreported because of delayed presentation or non-presentation during the school holiday period, for example, because with parents able to care for them they do not attend for medical certificates. However, if this were true, we would expect to see an immediate restart after school returns, which is not the case. Second, it could be because of other societal changes, such as parents also being on holiday and hence less transmission at work. However, if this were true, we would expect to see a simultaneous reduction in both child and adult cases. A final issue is that, even if reduction in incidence is real, it not clear whether there is a net annual decrease or merely a delay in total annual cases.

There are some limitations to both our data and the analysis. Good quality, numerical weekly flu data were unavailable for all states – e.g., South Australia reports its data as a mix of figures and numbers. This may have introduced some errors into the accuracy of the numbers for those states. We contacted the Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, which coordinates the national surveillance of influenza in Australia, to obtain raw data for each state and territory. However, the raw data underlying the notifications for 2019 will not be available for release until July 2020. There is also likely to be differences in the accuracy of different states’ data, due to the different methods of collection. For the analysis, we used a lag of one week to allow for the delay from exposure to the virus to confirmation of infection status¹⁷. In a sensitivity analysis we refitted the model without a lag and produced consistent results (Appendix 5, Extended data)¹⁶.

Given the size of the effect, these results have important public health implications as no other intervention has comparable effects. Hence closure or extension of holiday periods could be an emergency option for state governments. In addition to encouraging flu vaccination, the Centres for Disease Control has a number of suggestions in their guidance, such as encouraging students and staff to stay home when sick, liberalising sickness policies during epidemics, encouraging respiratory etiquette, encouraging hand hygiene, regular cleaning of shared surfaces such as door handles and faucets, and providing a “sick room” to quarantine students with flu-like illnesses¹⁹. An additional strategy is to consider face masks, which, with hand hygiene, appear to substantially reduce transmission. All these strategies would need to be triggered by health departments to schools at an appropriate point in an epidemic or pandemic.

Data availability