ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Determinants of safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in eastern part of Indonesia

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
PUBLISHED 23 Sep 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

Abstract

Background: Improving maternal health and reducing maternal mortality are part of the United Nations global Sustainable Development Goals for 2030. Ensuring every woman’s right to safe delivery is critical for reducing the maternal mortality rate. Our study aimed to identify determinants of safe delivery utilization among women in the eastern Indonesia.
Methods: This study was cross-sectional and used a secondary data from the 2017 Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS). A total of 2,162 women who had their last child in the five years preceding the survey and lived in the eastern part of Indonesia were selected as the respondents. Chi-squared test and binary logistic regression were used to understand the determinants of safe delivery.
Results: Higher child rank and interval ≤2 years (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19-0.47), unwanted pregnancy at time of becoming pregnant (OR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.05-2.08), richest wealth quintile (OR: 5.59, 95% CI: 3.37-9.30), more than four antenatal care visits (OR: 3.62, 95% CI: 2.73-4.79), rural residence, good composite labor force participation, and a good attitude towards domestic violence were found to be significantly associated with delivery at health facility. Higher child rank and interval ≤2 years (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83), husband/partner having completed secondary or higher education (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.48-3.22), being in the richest wealth quintile, and four other factors were found to be significantly associated with the assistance of skilled birth attendants.
Conclusions: This research extends our knowledge on the determinants of safe delivery among women in the eastern part of Indonesia. This study revealed that the economic status of household remains an important issue in improving safe delivery among women in eastern part of Indonesia. An open innovation and partnership process to improve safe delivery program that engages the full range of stakeholders should be developed based on economic situation.

Keywords

facility-based delivery, safe delivery, skilled birth delivery.

Revised Amendments from Version 1

Abstract: 1) we have added the term "secondary data" on the methods section. 2) We have changed the outcome into "delivery at health facility" and "assistance of skilled birth attendants" these changes also has been made consistently throughout of the manuscript.
Introduction: we have added the hypothesis and why this issue need to be raised in Indonesian context.
sample size and sampling: we have elaborated details of DHS design.
Variables: 1) We have changed the term of outcome as aforementioned on the abstract section. 2) We have elaborated the variable of women knowledge level.
Table 1-Table 5: we changed the term of variable as suggested by reviewer.
Discussion: 1) we have added some explanation on the variable of planning status of births. 2) we have added some information on the limitation of this study.  
References: we have revised and added some references.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ryan Michael F Oducado

Introduction

Maternal morbidity and mortality is a global health concern (World Health Organization, 2017). Every day in 2017, around 830 mothers died due to pregnancy and childbirth (World Health Organization, 2018). The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals set a target to reduce maternal deaths to 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030 (United Nations, 2015). In Indonesia, the maternal mortality rate is still high, at 305 per 100,000 live births (BPS, 2015b). A higher rate was found in the eastern part of Indonesia, namely Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, and Papua Island, than in the other islands (BPS, 2015a). One of the major causes of maternal mortality is haemorrhage, which is followed by eclampsia (Tejayanti et al., 2012). Safe delivery as the critical policy of making motherhood safer requires skilled birth attendants and delivery at health facilities across the provinces of Indonesia (Efendi et al., 2019; Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2014). As an archipelago country, institutional delivery and skilled assistant delivery are still a challenge because of the geographical situation (Belton et al., 2014; Ministry of Health [MoH], 2012). To increase safe delivery for Indonesian mothers, the government has set a goal to reach 85% of institutional deliveries in 2019 (Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2017). Even though the government has not yet set a goal for skilled attendant delivery specifically in this document, it should be assumed that the government demands the highest standard of health attainment.

The 2017 IDHS found that there is a gap in coverage of institutional delivery and skilled birth attendants between western provinces and eastern provinces of Indonesia. Eastern provinces of Indonesia, including Bali, Nusa Tenggara Island, Sulawesi Island, Maluku, and Papua Island, have not reached 70% coverage of safe delivery in either institutional delivery or skilled assistant delivery, as depicted in Figure 1 (BPS et al., 2018).

739425ae-5043-4991-80ff-0d613556529f_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Institutional delivery and skilled birth attendants by western and eastern provinces of Indonesia.

Studies that examine safe delivery have been conducted in some countries. A study conducted in Ethiopia found that residence, religion, educational level, age at first pregnancy, parity, and antenatal care (ANC) attendance have a significant association with safe delivery service utilization (Abera et al., 2011). Another study conducted in Tanzania reported that in addition to socio-demographic factors, women’s empowerment status contributed to the decision to give birth with a health professional (Shimamoto & Gipson, 2015). In a similar vein, studies in 13 sub-Saharan African countries found that living conditions and women’s autonomy are key factors of maternal healthcare utilization (Iacoella & Tirivayi, 2019). In Indonesia, a study about facility-based childbirth found that educational level, place of residence, working status, involvement in decision-making, economic status, and ANC visits are significantly associated with health facility delivery among women (Efendi et al., 2019). Furthermore, the gap in age and education between a woman and her husband/partner, women’s self-esteem, age at first marriage, and age at pregnancy were found have a high association with institutional delivery among Indonesian women (Kurniati et al., 2018).

The gap in coverage of safe delivery, including institutional delivery and skilled birth attendants, in western and eastern provinces of Indonesia should be resolved to attain the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Particularly in eastern part of Indonesia, safe delivery, both delivery at health facilitites and delivery assistance by skilled birth attendants remain a critical issue, we hypothesize that determinants associated with safe delivery utilization operate in a fundamentally different way among Indonesian women in this region. We tested this hypothesis using data from the Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) in 2017. Understanding the key factors related to safe delivery is key to prevent maternal morbidity and mortality in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in the eastern part of Indonesia.

Methods

Ethical statement

IDHS ethical clearance was obtained from the Inner City Fund (ICF) International. For this study, permission to use the data was obtained from ICF International. This study used existing IDHS data and re-analysis was done under the original consent provided by the participants. Thus, no further consent was obtained from the participants.

Data source

This was an analytical cross-sectional study that used data from the 2017 IDHS. The 2017 IDHS was conducted in 34 provinces in Indonesia from July to December 2017 by the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), National Population and Family Planning Board (BKKBN), and the Ministry of Health with technical help from ICF. The Individual Recode (IR) dataset was downloaded from www.dhsprogram.com after completing registration.

Sample size and sampling

This survey covered 1,970 census blocks in urban and rural areas. In the 2017 IDHS, a total of 49,627 women finished the survey from all 34 provinces in Indonesia. DHS sample designs were two-stage probability samples drawn from an existing sample frame. The sampling frame of the 2017 IDHS was the master sample of Census Blocks from the latest population census. The two-stage cluster sampling was used to select the respondents. The first stage was the selection of number of census blocks by systematic sampling proportional to size. In the second stage, 25 ordinary households were taken from the listing. All women aged 15–49 years in the households were eligible for interview. Interviews were performed as privately as possible with a detailed manual as reported by ICF (ICF Macro, 2020).

The inclusion criteria for this study were women aged 15–49 years who had their last child in the five years preceding the survey and lived in the eastern provinces of Indonesia. For the purpose of analysis, we divided Indonesia into two greater parts, western and eastern, based on the geographical location. The eastern provinces included Bali, West Nusa Tenggara, East Nusa Tenggara, North Sulawesi, Central Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, Gorontalo, West Sulawesi, Maluku, North Maluku, West Papua and Papua. In total, survey data from 2,162 women meeting the criteria were accessed for this study’s analysis.

Variables

The dependent variables in this study were place of delivery and type of assistance at delivery. Place of delivery was divided into two categories: health facility and non-health facility. Health facility delivery or institutional delivery is delivery that is carried out at a heath facility, including public health centers, clinics or maternity homes, and hospitals. The type of assistance at delivery variable was also divided into two categories: skilled birth attendants and unskilled birth attendants. Skilled birth attendants is defined as birth delivered with the assistance of skilled providers such as general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives, and skilled nurses (Croft et al., 2018).

There were several independent variables in this study. Age difference between man and woman was divided into four categories: woman older than man, 0–4 years younger, 5–7 years younger, and >7 years younger. Birth rank and interval was divided into five categories: second or third child with interval >2 years; first birth, second or third child with interval ≤2 years; fourth or higher child with interval >2 years; and fourth or higher child with interval ≤2 years. Planning status of births, women who had a birth or several births in the five years prior to their interview were asked whether the pregnancy had been wanted at the time it occurred (wanted then) or whether it had been wanted but had occurred sooner than wanted (wanted later), or whether the woman had wanted no further children at the time (unwanted/no more). Husband/partner’s education attainment was divided into three categories: incomplete primary education/none, complete primary or some secondary, and completed secondary or higher. Husband/partner’s occupation was divided into two categories: agricultural and non-agricultural. Wealth quintile was categorized as poorest, poorer, middle, richer, and richest (Rutstein & Johnson, 2004). Number of household members was divided into two categories: households that have less than four members and households with four or more members. Number of ANC visits was categorized as less than four times and four times or more. Covered by health insurance was divided into two categories: yes and no. Residence was categorized as urban and rural. Women’s empowerment variables, including composite labor force participation, attitude towards domestic violence (wife-beating), decision-making power, and women’s knowledge level, were divided into three categories: poor, moderate, and good. The women’s knowledge level variable was a composite of educational level and access to media. Further details on how these variables were assessed can be found in study as conducted by Sebayang et al. (2019).

Data analysis

The determinants of safe delivery were analyzed using a Chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Both analyses were performed in Stata version 16. The variables were significant at a p-value of 0.05, and the strength of the association was assessed using odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Among the women who were included in this study, 71.6% used a health facility and 86.2% were assisted by a skilled birth attendants at their last birth. The majority of the respondents are 0–4 years younger than their husband (41.2%), from the poorest wealth quintile (41.8%), have four or more members in the household (87.6%), are covered by health insurance (64.3%), and live in a rural residence (66.7%). Concerning the husband/partner’s education and occupation, 47.3% have completed secondary or higher education and more than half work in an agricultural occupation (54.1%). For almost half the respondents, their last child was a second or third child with an interval more than two years (44.9%). The majority of respondents had more than four ANC visits (88.4) and their pregnancy was wanted when they became pregnant (82.1%). In terms of women’s empowerment, most respondents have good composite labor force participation (35.7%), a moderate attitude towards domestic violence (34.8%), poor decision-making power (35.3%), and a poor level of knowledge (34.6%). Details about the descriptive characteristics of the respondents are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents regarding determinants of safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in eastern part of Indonesia (n=2,162).

Variablen%
Place of delivery
Non-health facility61528.4
Health facility1,54771.6
Type of assistance at delivery
Unskilled birth attendants29813.8
Skilled birth attendants1,86486.2
Age difference between man and woman
Woman older than man45020.8
0–4 years89041.2
5–7 years43420.1
>7 years38817.9
Birth rank and interval
Second or third child, interval >2 years97044.9
First birth60327.9
Second or third child, interval ≤2 years1316.0
Fourth or higher child, interval >2 years38417.8
Fourth or higher child, interval ≤2 years743.4
Planning status of births
Then1,77482.1
Later24611.4
No more1426.5
Husband/partner’s education attainment
Incomplete primary education/none29913.8
Completed primary or some secondary84138.9
Completed secondary or higher1,02247.3
Husband/partner’s occupation
Agricultural1,16954.1
Non-agricultural99345.9
Wealth quintile
Poorest90341.7
Poorer45421.0
Middle31514.6
Richer25311.7
Richest23711.0
Number of household members
<426812.4
≥41,89487.6
Number of antenatal care visits
<425111.6
≥41,91188.4
Covered by health insurance
No77235.7
Yes1,39064.3
Place of residence
Urban71933.3
Rural1,44366.7
Labor force participation
Poor69232.0
Moderate69832.3
Good77235.7
Attitude toward domestic violence
Poor67431.2
Moderate75334.8
Good73534.0
Decision-making power
Poor76435.3
Moderate70332.5
Good69532.1
Women’s knowledge level
Poor74834.6
Moderate71433.0
Good70032.4

In the bivariate analysis, most of the variables showed a significant association with a p-value of 0.05 with both outcomes: place of delivery and type of assistance at delivery. For the place of delivery outcome, three variables have a p-value of more than 0.05 (planning status of births, number of household members, decision-making power), while for the type of assistance at delivery outcome, four variables were not significant (age difference between man and woman, planning status of births, number of household members, decision-making power). Details about the bivariate analysis are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 2. Bivariate analysis of women’s characteristics and place of delivery outcome.

VariableNon-health
facility
Health facilityX2
N%N%
Age difference between man and woman
Woman older than man11726.133373.917.23**
0–4 years26229.462870.6
5–7 years10824.832675.2
>7 years12732.826167.2
Birth rank and interval
Second or third child, interval >2 years24124.972975.1200.57***
First birth12420.647979.4
Second or third child, interval ≤2 years4836.88363.2
Fourth or higher child, interval >2 years15640.622859.4
Fourth or higher child, interval ≤2 years4560.22939.8
Planning status of births
Then51328.9126171.13.51
Later6827.817872.2
No more3423.910876.1
Husband/partner’s education attainment
Incomplete primary education/none14347.915652.1233.59***
Completed primary or some secondary27732.956467.1
Completed secondary or higher19419.082881.0
Husband/partner’s occupation
Agricultural42336.274663.8162.94***
Non-agricultural19119.280280.8
Wealth quintile
Poorest42346.848053.2607.20***
Poorer10523.234976.8
Middle4514.327085.7
Richer2911.322488.7
Richest135.622494.4
Number of household members
<46725.220174.83.40
≥454728.91,34771.1
Number of antenatal care visits
<415361.69838.4328.54***
≥446124.11,45075.9
Covered by health insurance
No24231.353068.710.16*
Yes37326.81,01773.2
Residence
Urban8812.263187.8296.56***
Rural52736.591663.5
Labor force participation
Poor24835.844464.2123.78***
Moderate22131.747768.3
Good14518.862781.2
Attitude toward domestic violence
Poor23735.143764.946.49***
Moderate19425.855974.2
Good18425.055175.0
Decision making power
Poor21828.554671.50.64
Moderate19527.750872.3
Good20229.049371.0
Women’s knowledge level
Poor29038.845861.2145.48***
Moderate18726.252773.8
Good13719.656380.4

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001

Table 3. Bivariate analysis of women’s characteristics and type of assistance at delivery.

VariableUnskilled birth
attendants
Skilled birth
attendants
X2
N%N%
Age difference between man and woman
Woman older than man5612.439487.6
0–4 years12514.076586.07.55
5–7 years5412.538087.5
>7 years6316.332583.7
Birth rank and interval
Second or third child, interval >2 years11311.685788.4
First birth538.855091.2136.16***
Second or third child, interval ≤2 years2216.610983.4
Fourth or higher child, interval >2 years8722.729777.3
Fourth or higher child, interval ≤2 years2431.95068.1
Planning status of births
Then25414.31,52085.75.43
Later2911.821788.2
No more1510.512789.5
Husband/partner’s education attainment
Incomplete primary education/none10635.419364.6367.17***
Completed primary or some secondary13015.571184.5
Completed secondary or higher616.096194.0
Husband/partner’s occupation
Agricultural22919.694080.4155.85***
Non-agricultural696.992493.1
Wealth quintile
Poorest24326.966073.1
Poorer398.641591.4509.25***
Middle113.430496.6
Richer31.325098.7
Richest20.723599.3
Number of household members
<43011.323888.73.24
≥426714.11,62785.9
Number of antenatal care visits
<410240.514959.5364.74***
≥419710.31,71489.7
Covered by health insurance
No12115.765184.38.03*
Yes17712.71,21387.3
Residence
Urban385.368194.7139.61***
Rural26018.01,18382.0
Labor force participation
Poor12518.056782.0
Moderate11917.057983.095.35***
Good567.271692.8
Attitude toward domestic violence
Poor11116.556383.520.25**
Moderate10614.164785.9
Good8010.965589.1
Decision-making power
Poor11915.664584.47.34
Moderate9213.161186.9
Good8612.460987.6
Women’s knowledge level
Poor18024.156875.9231.52***
Moderate7410.464089.6
Good436.165793.9

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001

In the binary logistic regression analysis, delivery at a health facility was associated with several variables. Women who lived in a rural residence [AOR=0.49; 95% CI=0.36-0.66] were less likely to deliver in a health facility compared to women who lived in urban residence. A similar result was found for women whose last child was a fourth or higher child with an interval of two years or under [AOR=0.30; 95% CI=0.19-0.47]. Women from the richest wealth quintile family and those who had four or more ANC visits were five [AOR=5.59; 95% CI=3.37-9.30] and three times more likely to deliver in a health facility [AOR=3.62; 95% CI=2.73-4.79], respectively, compared to their reference.

Women who have good composite labor force participation [AOR=1.47; 95% CI=1.15-1.89] and a moderate attitude towards domestic violence [AOR=1.38; 95% CI=1.10-1.73] were more likely to deliver in a health facility. Women whose pregnancy was unwanted when they became pregnant [AOR=1.48 95% CI=1.05-2.08] were also more likely to deliver in a health facility. Details about the binary logistic regression analysis with a place of delivery outcome are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Binary logistic regression analysis with a place of delivery outcome.

VariableAORCI
LowerUpper
Age difference between man and woman
Woman older than manRef
0–4 years0.880.691.11
5–7 years1.140.881.46
>7 years0.960.731.26
Birth rank and interval
Second or third child, interval
>2 years
Ref
First birth1.37**1.091.71
Second or third child, interval
≤2 years
0.60**0.430.84
Fourth or higher child, interval
>2 years
0.66***0.520.82
Fourth or higher child, interval
≤2 years
0.30***0.190.47
Planning status of births
ThenRef
Later1.010.771.32
Unwanted1.48*1.052.08
Husband/partner’s education attainment
Incomplete primary education/
none
Ref
Completed primary or some
secondary
1.230.941.60
Completed secondary or higher1.260.941.69
Husband/partner’s occupation
AgriculturalRef
Non-agricultural1.170.931.47
Wealth quintile
PoorestRef
Poorer1.94***1.532.47
Middle2.85***2.063.94
Richer3.23***2.254.64
Richest5.59***3.379.30
Number of household members
<4Ref
≥41.020.751.39
Number of antenatal care visits
<4Ref
≥43.62***2.734.79
Covered by health insurance
NoRef
Yes1.150.951.38
Place of residence
UrbanRef
Rural0.49***0.360.66
Labor force participation
PoorRef
Moderate1.140.931.40
Good1.47**1.151.89
Attitude toward domestic violence
PoorRef
Moderate1.38**1.101.73
Good1.33*1.041.69
Decision-making power
PoorRef
Moderate0.850.691.06
Good0.840.661.06
Women’s knowledge level
PoorRef
Moderate1.130.921.40
Good1.170.931.47

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

According to the type of assistance at delivery outcome, women whose last child was a fourth or higher child with an interval of two years or under [AOR=0.49; 95% CI=0.29-0.83] were less likely to deliver with an assistance of skilled birth attendants. Women whose husband completed secondary or higher education were two times [AOR=2.18; 95% CI=1.48-3.22] more likely to deliver with an assistance of skilled birth attendants. Likewise, women who had four or more ANC visits and were from the richest wealth quintile were three [AOR=3.83; 95% CI=2.77-5.30] and 15 times [AOR=15.69; 95% CI= 5.53-44.50] more likely to be helped by a skilled birth attendants, respectively.

Women whose husband worked in a non-agricultural occupation [AOR=1.35; 95% CI=1.00-1.81] were more likely to deliver with a skilled birth attendants. A similar result was found for women with good composite labor force participation [AOR=1.58; 95% CI=1.11-2.26] and a good level of knowledge [AOR=1.76; 95% CI=1.25-2.46] (Table 5).

Table 5. Binary logistic regression analysis with type of assistance at delivery.

VariableAORCI
LowerUpper
Age difference between man and woman
Woman older than manRef
0–4 years0.890.651.22
5–7 years0.990.711.36
>7 years1.010.721.42
Birth rank and interval
Second or third child, interval
>2 years
Ref
First birth1.280.931.76
Second or third child, interval
≤2 years
0.800.481.33
Fourth or higher child, interval
>2 years
0.730.531.00
Fourth or higher child, interval
≤2 years
0.49**0.290.83
Planning status of births
ThenRef
Later1.120.741.68
No more1.580.962.59
Husband/partner’s education attainment
Incomplete primary education/
none
Ref
Completed primary or some
secondary
1.90***1.422.55
Completed secondary or higher2.18***1.483.22
Husband/partner’s occupation
AgriculturalRef
Non-agricultural1.35*1.001.81
Wealth quintile
PoorestRef
Poorer2.33***1.703.18
Middle5.14***3.198.28
Richer10.84***5.3422.01
Richest15.69***5.5344.50
Number of household members
<4Ref
≥40.870.561.35
Number of antenatal care visits
<4Ref
≥43.83***2.775.30
Covered by health insurance
NoRef
Yes1.190.941.51
Residence
UrbanRef
Rural0.840.541.30
Labor force participation
PoorRef
Moderate0.990.761.29
Good1.58*1.112.26
Attitude toward domestic violence
PoorRef
Moderate1.240.941.63
Good1.300.961.77
Decision-making power
PoorRef
Moderate0.890.691.14
Good0.990.731.34
Women’s knowledge level
PoorRef
Moderate1.54**1.132.11
Good1.76**1.252.46

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

Delivery was regarded as safe when it was attended by a skilled birth attendant and took place in a health facility. This study found that several variables have a significant association with place of delivery and type of assistance at delivery. Women from the richest wealth quintile were more likely to have a delivery in a health facility than those from the poorest wealth quintile. This finding is consistent with that of a previous study in Indonesia. The wealth index of the household would contribute to the access to health care services, including institutional delivery (Caulfield et al., 2016; Do et al., 2015; Efendi et al., 2019; Roro et al., 2014). Women from the richest wealth quintile were more likely to have a delivery with a skilled birth attendants than those from the poorest wealth quintile. This finding is consistent with that of a previous study conducted in Bangladesh (Muhammed et al., 2017). Women from low-income families may find it difficult to pay for a skilled birth attendants, so they prefer to give birth without professional assistance (Muhammed et al., 2017). Therefore, the coverage of health insurance must be enhanced so that women in all the wealth quintiles can have equal access to health care services.

A higher child rank and interval of ≤2 years was associated with a lower chance of women having a delivery in a health facility and being assisted by a health professional. This result is similar to those of studies conducted in Ethiopia and Nigeria (Abera et al., 2011; Ononokpono & Odimegwu, 2014). Women with a higher child rank will have more experience with pregnancy and delivery, so they feel that they have the confidence to have a delivery outside a health facility (Abera et al., 2011). Another argument is that women have limited access to health services due to the burden of their economic situation (Ononokpono & Odimegwu, 2014). The results for delivery with a skilled birth attendant are similar to those of studies conducted in Sudan and Ethiopia (Mustafa & Mukhtar, 2015; Wilunda et al., 2015). Women with a higher birth rank tend to rely on their experience from previous pregnancies, believing they already know about childbirth. Consequently, they choose to give birth without professional assistance (Mustafa & Mukhtar, 2015). Review studies conducted in African countries also highlighted the link between higher parity and lower likelihood of delivery at health facility (Moyer & Mustafa, 2013). Therefore, health education about safe delivery should prioritize mothers with a high child rank by giving them greater access to free health care services.

Women who had more than four ANC visits during their pregnancy were found to be three times more likely to have a safe delivery. This is consistent with the results of studies conducted in Uganda and Ethiopia (Abera et al., 2011; Atusiimire et al., 2019). Furthermore, a population-based study conducted in Bangladesh had a similar result, which emphasized the positive effect of the ANC on utilization of delivery at health facility (Pervin et al., 2012). The ANC can prevent unsafe delivery because it will provide health education for the mother, giving information and recommending the place of delivery according to the mother’s and fetus’s condition (Atusiimire et al., 2019). Women who had more than four ANC visits during their pregnancy were found to be more likely to have a skilled birth attendant. This is consistent with the result of a study that was conducted in Kenya (Gitimu et al., 2015). ANC attendance will influence the decision of the mother to have an assisted delivery because the ANC emphasizes the importance of safe delivery (Gitimu et al., 2015). ANC visits must be optimized for pregnant women so that mothers are more exposed to information about safe delivery. The information that the mother receives will influence the decision on where to deliver the baby. Therefore, a minimum number of ANC visits should be given to all pregnant women so they can monitor the condition of the baby and have more knowledge about safe pregnancy and delivery.

Another finding was that women who wanted no more pregnancies when they became pregnant were more likely to give birth in a health facility. This finding is consistent with that of a study conducted in Egypt (Marston & Cleland, 2003). However, it is inconsistent with the results of a study conducted in Bangladesh, which showed that women who have an unintended pregnancy were less likely to visit an ANC service and more likely to have a home delivery (Kamal, 2013). There was no study that explained this issue, as it may be related to the social norms and health system of the country itself. We assume that the desire to limit chidbearing may give sufficient time for women to plan ahead some alternatives including the place of delivery. Therefore, this topic should be analyzed further by considering other variables.

Women from a rural residence were found to be less likely to have a delivery in a health facility. This finding is similar to those of previous studies conducted in Bangladesh and Indonesia (Efendi et al., 2019; Kamal, 2013; Kenea & Jisha, 2017). Living in an urban residence allows easier access to health facilities than living in rural areas. In addition, access to information is easier in urban areas so information about safe delivery can be spread more easily (Kamal, 2013). Therefore, the gap between rural and urban areas should be taken into consideration by the government regarding the issue of maternal and child health.

Women who had good composite labor force participation and a good attitude towards domestic violence were more likely to have a delivery in a health facility and be assisted by a health professional. This is consistent with the result of studies conducted in Ethiopia and Bangladesh (Kamal, 2013; Tiruneh et al., 2017). In Bangladesh, women who were against domestic violence and more independent economically were more likely to have four or more ANC service visits, which may lead the women to have a delivery in a health facility (Kamal, 2013). Women who had good composite labor force participation and a good knowledge level were more likely to have a delivery with an assistance of skilled birth attendants. This is consistent with the result of studies conducted in Senegal and Tanzania (Shimamoto & Gipson, 2015). If women have greater empowerment, in terms of knowledge and economic power, this will lead to improvement in their health. They can choose the best for their health, including choosing to have a safe delivery (Prata et al., 2017). Therefore, gender equality needs to be improved so women can make decisions about their health.

Husband/partner’s education attainment was found to be significantly associated with skilled birth attendants delivery. Women whose husband/partner had completed secondary or higher education were more likely to have a skilled birth attendant. This is consistent with the results of studies conducted in Kenya and Somalia (Gitimu et al., 2015; Yusuf et al., 2017). Husbands with a higher level of education will have more knowledge about health, including safe delivery (Kifle et al., 2018). As the head of the household, the husband’s knowledge will affect the reproductive health decisions (Yusuf et al., 2017). Engagement of the husband in the issue of maternal health should be expanded in all levels of the community.

Women whose husband/partner’s occupation was non-agricultural were found to be significantly more likely to have a delivery with professional assistance. This finding is similar to those of studies conducted in Nigeria and Ethiopia (Adewemimo et al., 2014; Fekadu & Regassa, 2014). The husband’s occupation will affect the family’s income. If the family income increases, the decision to have a skilled birth attendant will also be affected. In addition, another study conducted in Ethiopia found that women whose husbands work in a non-agricultural occupation tend to use an ANC service, which encourages the decision to give birth with professional assistance (Tsegay et al., 2013). Therefore, health promotion about safe delivery is important for the husband/partner, especially for husbands/partners whose occupation is agricultural.

Limitations and strengths

This study used secondary data from the 2017 IDHS, so the selection of the variables was determined by the availability of the data. Another limitation is that some questions in the survey needed respondents to recall what happened five years preceding the survey, so the information may not be precisely stated. In addition to the limitations, however, this study has strengths. The sample of this study was selected using two-stage cluster sampling, so the data were nationally representative. Therefore, the results can provide recommendations for policymakers to develop effective regulation so the coverage gap of safe delivery between western and eastern provinces in Indonesia can be reduced. The practical benefits of this study is to facilitate use of these data for planning, policy-making and program management in the area of maternal health especially the safe delivery.

Conclusions

Safe delivery was found to be determined by several factors, which reflected the need for multi-stakeholder intervention in increasing the practice of safe delivery across the country. Programmatic and structured policies that target poor women and those with a low education level and encourage husbands/partners’ participation in this issue may help increase the prevalence of safe delivery in the eastern part of Indonesia. This study gives some recommendations to the policymakers, such as health promotion about safe delivery should be prioritized for women who have a high birth rank. Moreover, not only the women, but also their husband/partner should be involved in health education. The coverage of health insurance and health facilities should be enhanced so that everyone can have equal access to health services. Furthermore, the women’s empowerment program should be maximized so that all the women can choose the best for their health.

Data availability

Data used in this study is available online from the Indonesian 2017 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) website under the ‘Individual Recode’ section. Access to the dataset requires registration and is granted only for legitimate research purposes. A guide for how to apply for dataset access is available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/Access-Instructions.cfm.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 05 May 2020
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Efendi F, Sebayang SK, Astutik E et al. Determinants of safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in eastern part of Indonesia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:332 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23324.2)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 23 Sep 2020
Revised
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 24 Sep 2020
Ryan Michael F Oducado, College of Nursing, West Visayas State University, Iloilo City, Philippines 
Approved
VIEWS 11
I have no further comments to make. The ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Oducado RMF. Reviewer Report For: Determinants of safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in eastern part of Indonesia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:332 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.29415.r71837)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 05 May 2020
Views
24
Cite
Reviewer Report 21 Aug 2020
Asmaa Salah Eldin Mohamed Saleh, Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt 
Approved
VIEWS 24
This is a good written article, but there are little things I think to make it perfect if the author follows it.
First: in Introduction: the author does not mention study hypotheses. Explain why the current research is important.
... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Saleh ASEM. Reviewer Report For: Determinants of safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in eastern part of Indonesia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:332 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.25747.r66055)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Views
37
Cite
Reviewer Report 26 May 2020
Ryan Michael F Oducado, College of Nursing, West Visayas State University, Iloilo City, Philippines 
Approved
VIEWS 37
This article looks into the determinants of safe delivery in the eastern part of Indonesia. The report addresses an important topic and contributes to the advancement of knowledge on maternal health and in reducing maternal mortality.

I ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Oducado RMF. Reviewer Report For: Determinants of safe delivery utilization among Indonesian women in eastern part of Indonesia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:332 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.25747.r63312)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 23 Sep 2020
    Ferry Efendi, Faculty of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
    23 Sep 2020
    Author Response
    We thank all reviewers for their generous and positive comments on our manuscript. With regard to their reviews, we have edited the manuscript to respond to their comments. In particular, ... Continue reading
  • Author Response 23 Sep 2020
    Ferry Efendi, Faculty of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
    23 Sep 2020
    Author Response
    We thank all reviewers for their generous and positive comments on our manuscript. With regard to their reviews, we have edited the manuscript to respond to their comments. In particular, ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 23 Sep 2020
    Ferry Efendi, Faculty of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
    23 Sep 2020
    Author Response
    We thank all reviewers for their generous and positive comments on our manuscript. With regard to their reviews, we have edited the manuscript to respond to their comments. In particular, ... Continue reading
  • Author Response 23 Sep 2020
    Ferry Efendi, Faculty of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
    23 Sep 2020
    Author Response
    We thank all reviewers for their generous and positive comments on our manuscript. With regard to their reviews, we have edited the manuscript to respond to their comments. In particular, ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 05 May 2020
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.