Systematic Review
metrics
Revised
Integration of Democratic Values in Natural Sciences Education: a Review of the Literature of the Last 50 Years
[version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Genç Osman ilhan;
Anissa Lestari Kadiyono;
John Mart Elesio
- Funder
- Universidad de La Sabana
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Foundational Competencies and Responsibilities of a Research Software Engineer: Current State and Suggestions for Future Directions
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Miranda Mundt;
Uwe Schmitt
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking
- Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Revised
‘What seems to be missing is actual reality’ Why are postdocs (and closely related researchers) hesitant to engage with non-research-focused professional development opportunities?
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Santiago Schnell;
Christine Teelken;
Maresi Nerad and Cecilia Bibbo
- Funders
- Research England
- Wellcome Trust
- University of Cambridge
Research Article
metrics
Revised
The most prevalent perceived barriers to sharing research data at the point of manuscript acceptance in health and life sciences: a survey at the University of Bristol
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Stefan Reichmann;
Anna Catharina Vieira Armond
- Funder
- Philanthropic donation from Professor John Climax
Research Article
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
It’s complicated: staff experiences of academic integrity at a Mauritian university
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
- Funder
- University of South Africa
Research Article
metrics
From Recruitment to Retirement: Research Infrastructure Staff Views on the Diversification of Scientific Career Paths at Universities in Sweden in 2024
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Stefano Gaburro;
Julián D. Cortés;
Emma Karoune;
Fran Bagenal
Brief Report
metrics
Revised
Are Narrative CVs contributing towards shifting research culture? Workshop Report from the 2023 Recognition and Rewards Festival
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Maria Pietilä;
Simon Kolstoe;
Marianne Gauffriau;
Ruth Schmidt
Research Article
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Political bias in historiography - an experimental investigation of preferences for publication as a function of political orientation
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
- Funder
- Berlin University Alliance
Research Article
metrics
Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Juan-José Boté-Vericad;
Joachim Schöpfel;
Sarahanne M Field;
Priya Silverstein
Brief Report
metrics
Revised
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Junwen Luo;
Santiago Vasco-Morales;
Mario COCCIA;
Adrian Barnett
- Funder
- This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Coordinating Centre (NIHRCC), based at the University of Southampton, through its Research on Research programme of work. The views and opinions expressed in the discussion are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHRCC had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Research Article
metrics
Revised
An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 5 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Artemis Chaleplioglou;
Kimberly Powell;
Luka Ursić;
Amanda Blatch-Jones;
Shelly Melissa Pranic;
Andrew Tattersall
Systematic Review
metrics
Revised
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture
[version 3; peer review: 4 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Steven De Peuter;
Elisabeth Grey;
Elizabeth Gadd;
Stephen Curry
- Funder
- Research England
Research Article
metrics
More value and less waste in research on primary cam morphology and its natural history: a qualitative interview study of stakeholders' perspectives
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Samantha Bunzli;
Jinchi Tang
Method Article
metrics
Revised
The SCOPE framework – implementing ideals of responsible research assessment
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Sven E Hug;
Dr Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza, PhD
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Online marketing and brand awareness for HEI: A review and bibliometric analysis
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Sanjib Biswas;
Arun Vijay Subbarayalu
- Funder
- No funding has been taken for this research
Opinion Article
metrics
Monitoring Open Science as transformative change: Towards a systemic framework
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Hans De Jonge;
Francesca Di Donato
Research Article
metrics
Revised
The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Antica Culina;
Stefanie Mueller;
Rob Heirene
- Funders
- Boston University
- University of Sydney
Editorial
metrics
NOT PEER REVIEWED
F1000Research collaboration with the Research on Research Registry & Hub
[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
- Funder
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Brenda M Stoesz;
Mary Davis;
Stephen Gow;
Salim Razı
Systematic Review
metrics
Revised
Peruvian contributions to scientific publications on experimental research against COVID-19: a systematic review
[version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Christopher J Peterson;
Somipam R. Shimray
- Funder
- Universidad Católica de Santa María
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new