Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Evaluation & Assessment
Review
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Open Science for Missions and Observatories: Practical Choices to Shape Your Observing Adventure
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
- Funder
- The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Work done by staff of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, was performed under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004).
Systematic Review
metrics
A scoping review on the use of Research Development Awards by research funding organisations in the UK and beyond.
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Peter Bower
Systematic Review
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Quantity or Quality? A Systematic Review of Research Policies, Funding, and Collaboration in Indonesia
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
Study Protocol
metrics
Evaluation of automated assessments of systematic review adherence to the PRISMA 2020 statement: study protocol
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Ahmed S. BaHammam
- Funders
- Monash University Early Career Research Excellence Program (ECREP) grant
- National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant
Opinion Article
metrics
AWAITING PEER REVIEW
The need for an evolution of credit attribution in modern scientific publishing
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Peer Reviewers
Invited
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Evaluating the Types of Performance Monitoring Used in Private Chartered Universities in Uganda: A Mixed-Methods
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
M Mukhibat Syaufa;
Issah Iddrisu
Research Article
metrics
From Recruitment to Retirement: Research Infrastructure Staff Views on the Diversification of Scientific Career Paths at Universities in Sweden in 2024
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Stefano Gaburro;
Julián D. Cortés;
Emma Karoune;
Fran Bagenal
Method Article
metrics
Revised
ALL-IN meta-analysis: breathing life into living systematic reviews and prospective meta-analyses
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Junfeng Wang;
Ewelina Rogozinska;
Shubhendu Trivedi
- Funder
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Systematic Review
metrics
Health policy at your fingertips? Mapping and evaluation of existing digital health policy repositories.
[version 1; peer review: 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Sarah L Dalglish
- Funder
- Global Health Policy Lab (GHPL) Initiative from the Novartis Foundation, Johnson & Johnson and Novo Nordisk
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Addressing common inferential mistakes when failing to reject the null-hypothesis
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Ying Cui;
J. Alexander Heimel
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.
- AFS was supported by BHF
- UCL BHF Research Accelerator
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Are numerical scores important for grant assessment? A cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Mariana Pascual;
Sven E Hug;
Seba Qussini and Dr. Samer Hammoudeh;
Jan-Ole Hesselberg
- Funder
- Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Method Article
metrics
Revised
The SCOPE framework – implementing ideals of responsible research assessment
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Sven E Hug;
Dr Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza, PhD
Research Article
metrics
Revised
How an international research funder’s forum developed guiding principles to ensure value and reduce waste in research
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Till Bruckner;
Hans Lund;
Maximilian Siebert
Research Article
metrics
Building a fatigue research collaborative: A scientometrics, topic and gap analysis
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Jafar Kolahi;
Luis Manuel Mota de Sousa
- Funder
- Crohn's and Colitis UK
Research Article
metrics
Revised
The innovative dimension of the research training programmes under H2020-MSCA-ITN: a methodological approach to track, measure and analyse innovative aspects and provide policy-feedback conclusions.
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Costis Kompis;
Nikolaos D. Alexopoulos;
Alessandro Marino
Systematic Review
metrics
Revised
The post-award effort of managing and reporting on funded research: a scoping review
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Caitlin Brandenburg;
Simon Kerridge
- Funder
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
Study Protocol
metrics
Revised
Current trends, barriers, and facilitators of use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews: Protocol
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Theresa Sipe;
Roger Chou;
Simone Willis
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Community review: a robust and scalable selection system for resource allocation within open science and innovation communities
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Ferdinando Patat;
Dimitrios Kouis
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- AXA Research Fund
Method Article
metrics
Revised
The effect of the scale of grant scoring on ranking accuracy
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Rachel Heyard;
Alejandra Recio-Saucedo
- Funder
- The Australian Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Research Software vs. Research Data I: Towards a Research Data definition in the Open Science context
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Tibor Koltay;
Remedios Melero;
Joachim Schöpfel
- Funder
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new