Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Scholarly Publishing & Peer Review

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this gateway (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this gateway
61-80 of 98 ARTICLES
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16523.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Sharing health research data – the role of funders in improving the impact
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Phaik-Yeong Cheah; Amanda Blatch-Jones; Keith C. Norris
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 24 Dec 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16460.1
Opinion Article metrics
Publishing peer review materials
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Jessica K Polka; Tony Ross-Hellauer
  • Funders
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
  • Wellcome Trust
PUBLISHED 17 Oct 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Monica Berger; Johann Mouton; Joanna Chataway
  • Funder
  • University of Ottawa, Research Chair
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14488.3
Research Article metrics
Revised
Missing the point: are journals using the ideal number of decimal places?
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Tim J. Cole; David J. Winter
  • Funder
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 10 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15436.1
Research Article metrics
Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Larry Peiperl; David Mellor; Anisa Rowhani-Farid
PUBLISHED 27 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12344.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Best practice data life cycle approaches for the life sciences
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Johannes Starlinger; Sven Nahnsen
  • Funders
  • Bioplatforms Australia
  • University of Melbourne
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 04 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13789.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Classification of processes involved in sharing individual participant data from clinical trials
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Florian Naudet; Matthew R. Sydes; Matthias Löbe
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13477.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Badges for sharing data and code at Biostatistics: an observational study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Gustav Nilsonne; Bastian Greshake
  • Funder
  • Queensland University of Technology
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Mar 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
Review metrics
Revised
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers David Moher; Virginia Barbour
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13060.1
Opinion Article metrics
Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Lex Bouter; C.K. Gunsalus
PUBLISHED 06 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12185.1
Opinion Article metrics
The new alchemy: Online networking, data sharing and research activity distribution tools for scientists
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Alice Meadows; Matthew R. Hartings; Stacy R. Konkiel
PUBLISHED 03 Aug 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9453.2
Method Article metrics
Revised
Method-centered digital communities on protocols.io for fast-paced scientific innovation
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers David D. Dunigan and Irina Agarkova; Lawrence Patrick Kane
  • Funder
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Jun 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11415.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
We can shift academic culture through publishing choices
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Björn Brembs; Anthony Dart; Chris H.J. Hartgerink
  • Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Isaac Newton Trust
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 09 Jun 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11408.1
Opinion Article metrics
On the origin of nonequivalent states: How we can talk about preprints
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Todd Carpenter
PUBLISHED 02 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11334.1
Review metrics
Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Michael Lauer; Lenny Teytelman
PUBLISHED 02 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11366.1
Research Article metrics
Looking into Pandora's Box: The Content of Sci-Hub and its Usage
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers April Hathcock; Gabriel Gardner and Stephen McLaughlin; Jill Emery; Balázs Bodó
PUBLISHED 21 Apr 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10422.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Building the infrastructure to make science metrics more scientific
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers David J. Currie; Maria Nedeva; Ivan Oransky and Alison Abritis
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Apr 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10318.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Fairness in scientific publishing
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Gustav Nilsonne; Dragan Pavlović; Oyewale Tomori
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 17 Jan 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8452.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The effects of an editor serving as one of the reviewers during the peer-review process
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Alesia Zuccala; Bernd Pulverer; Ivan Oransky and Alison Abritis
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2016
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8216.1
Opinion Article metrics
Junior biomedical scientists and preprints
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Needhi Bhalla; Ron Vale
PUBLISHED 07 Mar 2016
61-80 of 98 ARTICLES
Gateway Areas
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.