Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research on Research, Policy & Culture

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this gateway (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this gateway
Home Gateways Research on Research, Policy & Culture
241-260 of 301 ARTICLES
Previous Next
 in 
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15334.1
Opinion Article metrics
Ten considerations for open peer review
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Birgit Schmidt, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C Moylan
Peer Reviewers Richard Smith; Darko Hren
  • Funders
  • Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth / COMET program
  • European Commission
PUBLISHED 29 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15436.1
Research Article metrics
Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Jamie Kirkham, David Moher
Peer Reviewers Larry Peiperl; David Mellor; Anisa Rowhani-Farid
PUBLISHED 27 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15106.1
Research Article metrics
Bibliometrics of the 100 most-cited articles on refugee populations
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Musatafa Khosa, Ahmed Waqas, Mahnoor Javaid, Jessica Singh, Sadiq Naveed, Salman Majeed, Faisal Khosa
Peer Reviewers Syed Raza Shah; Samy A Azer
PUBLISHED 22 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15078.1
Opinion Article metrics
A new paradigm for the scientific enterprise: nurturing the ecosystem
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Alexander K. Lancaster, Anne E. Thessen, Arika Virapongse
Peer Reviewers Jonathan P. Tennant; Gary S. McDowell; Cameron Neylon
PUBLISHED 20 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12344.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Best practice data life cycle approaches for the life sciences
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Philippa C. Griffin, Jyoti Khadake, Kate S. LeMay, Suzanna E. Lewis, Sandra Orchard, Andrew Pask, Bernard Pope, Ute Roessner, Keith Russell, Torsten Seemann, Andrew Treloar, Sonika Tyagi, Jeffrey H. Christiansen, Saravanan Dayalan, Simon Gladman, Sandra B. Hangartner, Helen L. Hayden, William W.H. Ho, Gabriel Keeble-Gagnère, Pasi K. Korhonen, Peter Neish, Priscilla R. Prestes, Mark F. Richardson, Nathan S. Watson-Haigh, Kelly L. Wyres, Neil D. Young, Maria Victoria Schneider
Peer Reviewers Johannes Starlinger; Sven Nahnsen
  • Funders
  • Bioplatforms Australia
  • University of Melbourne
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 04 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12538.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The unhappy postdoc: a survey based study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Amir Grinstein, Roi Treister
Peer Reviewers Navid Ghaffarzadegan and Ran Xu; Nick Riddiford; Gary S. McDowell; Jennifer M. Miller
  • Funder
  • Self-funded
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 02 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14600.1
Opinion Article metrics
The need for a new science, technology and medicine University in the Middle East: Carving the future
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Peer Reviewers Sammy Ohene; George Perry
PUBLISHED 26 Apr 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13789.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Classification of processes involved in sharing individual participant data from clinical trials
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Christian Ohmann, Steve Canham, Rita Banzi, Wolfgang Kuchinke, Serena Battaglia
Peer Reviewers Florian Naudet; Matthew R. Sydes; Matthias Löbe
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.2
Review metrics
Revised
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Susan Guthrie, Ioana Ghiga, Steven Wooding
Peer Reviewers Adrian Barnett; Aled Morgan Edwards
  • Funder
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 27 Mar 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13477.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Badges for sharing data and code at Biostatistics: an observational study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Anisa Rowhani-Farid, Adrian G. Barnett
Peer Reviewers Gustav Nilsonne; Bastian Greshake
  • Funder
  • Queensland University of Technology
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Mar 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13760.2
Correspondence metrics
Revised
Improving the biomedical research literature: insights from authors’ editors can help journal editors define and refine their core competencies
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Valerie Matarese, Karen Shashok
Peer Reviewers Joy Burrough-Boenisch; Na Luo
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 21 Feb 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12496.3
Research Article metrics
Revised
The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Stefanie Gregorius, Laura Dean, Donald C Cole, Imelda Bates
Peer Reviewers Yaso Kunaratnam; Adrian Barnett
  • Funder
  • Department for International Development, UK Government
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 16 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
Review metrics
Revised
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Jonathan P. Tennant, Jonathan M. Dugan, Daniel Graziotin, Damien C. Jacques, François Waldner, Daniel Mietchen, Yehia Elkhatib, Lauren B. Collister, Christina K. Pikas, Tom Crick, Paola Masuzzo, Anthony Caravaggi, Devin R. Berg, Kyle E. Niemeyer, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Sara Mannheimer, Lillian Rigling, Daniel S. Katz, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, Josmel Pacheco-Mendoza, Nazeefa Fatima, Marta Poblet, Marios Isaakidis, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, Sébastien Renaut, Christopher R. Madan, Lisa Matthias, Jesper Nørgaard Kjær, Daniel Paul O'Donnell, Cameron Neylon, Sarah Kearns, Manojkumar Selvaraju, Julien Colomb
Peer Reviewers David Moher; Virginia Barbour
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13060.1
Opinion Article metrics
Amending published articles: time to rethink retractions and corrections?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]
Virginia Barbour, Theodora Bloom, Jennifer Lin, Elizabeth Moylan
Peer Reviewers Lex Bouter; C.K. Gunsalus
PUBLISHED 06 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2
Research Note metrics
Revised
A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Laura McDonald, Anna Schultze, Alex Simpson, Sophie Graham, Radek Wasiak, Sreeram V. Ramagopalan
Peer Reviewers Laurie A. Tomlinson;  Robin E. Champieux
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Nov 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10086.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Monitoring the compliance of the academic enterprise with the Fair Labor Standards Act
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Adriana Bankston, Gary S. McDowell
Peer Reviewers Nathan L. Vanderford; Christopher L. Pickett; Paula E Stephan
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 28 Sep 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
Systematic Review metrics
Revised
What is open peer review? A systematic review
[version 2; peer review: 4 approved]
Tony Ross-Hellauer
Peer Reviewers Richard Walker; Theodora Bloom; Bahar Mehmani; Emily Ford
  • Funder
  • European Commission
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 31 Aug 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12404.1
Research Article metrics
Exploring Vietnamese co-authorship patterns in social sciences with basic network measures of 2008-2017 Scopus data
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]
Tung Manh Ho, Ha Viet Nguyen, Thu-Trang Vuong, Quang-Minh Dam, Hiep-Hung Pham, Quan-Hoang Vuong
Peer Reviewers Tuyen Quang Tran; Donaldine E . Samson; Ly Thi Tran
PUBLISHED 24 Aug 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11029.3
Research Article metrics
Revised
A survey of working conditions within biomedical research in the United Kingdom
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Nick Riddiford
Peer Reviewers Jessica K Polka; Kearney T. W. Gunsalus
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 16 Aug 2017
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12185.1
Opinion Article metrics
The new alchemy: Online networking, data sharing and research activity distribution tools for scientists
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Antony J. Williams, Lou Peck, Sean Ekins
Peer Reviewers Alice Meadows; Matthew R. Hartings; Stacy R. Konkiel
PUBLISHED 03 Aug 2017
241-260 of 301 ARTICLES
Previous Next
Gateway Areas
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new
Our Links
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.