ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Research Article
Revised

Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels

[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
PUBLISHED 22 Jul 2025
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Plant Science gateway.

This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway.

Abstract

Background

Formaldehyde a commonly used embalming fluid for the preservation of cadavers, produces numerous short and long-term side effects on the students and staff working with it. Indoor plants have been shown to reduce atmospheric formaldehyde levels. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of indoor plants in reducing formaldehyde levels in ambient air to levels deemed safe by WHO standards

Methods

The study was conducted in the storage room of the Anatomical dissection hall. 7 potted plants of one variety were kept in the storage room for 14 days and the Formaldehyde reading was measured using a VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) monitor. Then the same was done with no plant. This cycle was repeated 2 more times, with two different plant species. The three spieces of plants used for this study were as follows: Dracaena trifasciata, Epipremnum aureum, Spathiphyllum.

Results

The results were analysed and compared and it was determined that the effect of having a plant present versus having no plant present on the Formaldehyde concentration in the air was inconclusive as Dracaena trifasciata failed to reject the null hypothesis altogether (p-value>0.05), while Epipremnum aureum and Spathiphyllum rejected the null hypothesis (p-value<0.05), however they both had a weak positive correlation with formaldehyde concentration.

Conclusion

The efficacy of indoor plants in reducing formaldehyde levels in ambient air needs to be further explored and validated since all the prior studies conducted were in controlled environment and should be done in a real time scenario for its practical and beneficial uses.

Keywords

Air quality; anatomical dissection hall, indoor plants, indoor air, volatile organic compound, workspace environment, cadaver, formaldehyde

Revised Amendments from Version 2

This version incorporates significant methodological improvements based on peer review feedback.
The methodology section has been strengthened with specific technical details about the VOC monitor (Forbix Semicon air quality monitor with 0.005 ppm detection limit) and explicit statement of statistical tests used (paired t-tests). We have also enhanced the data analysis section to clearly describe the analytical approach and added regression analysis results to supplementary data files. We have included standard error bars in Figure 2 and added p-values with significance symbols directly to Table 1 to improve clarity of statistical relationships between control and experimental groups.
Additional improvements include expanded discussion of measurement limitations and reliability concerns regarding VOC meters, addressing potential false positive/negative results. The conclusion section now explicitly identifies future research directions, including the need for studies comparing scenarios with operational versus non-operational exhaust fans to better simulate real teaching environments, and recommendations for longer-term studies (3-6 months) to assess plant adaptation effects.

See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ranganath Vallabhajosyula
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Yasar Sajjad
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Kumar Satish Ravi
See the authors' detailed response to the review by Choy Ker Woon

Introduction

Formalin is an ideal embalming fluid used in the preservation of the human body since it acts as a biocide by coagulating the bacterial protoplasm and is a powerful germicide. It preserves tissues by making new complex molecules that are unfit for the growth of microorganisms.

Medical students who are exposed to formaldehyde (FA) during their dissection course (Shiraishi 2006) have reported various physical symptoms, such as burning eyes, lacrimation, irritation of airways, and dermatitis. FA has attracted attention as a health hazard for students and instructors, as FA concentrations in the air of gross anatomy laboratories often exceed permissible limits. On an average, students and instructors are exposed to 5.59 ppm FA, for which the maximum permissible exposure limit, according to OSHA PEL guidelines, is 0.75 ppm—essentially more than 7 times the maximum amount—and is more than 69 times greater than the recommended levels of FA exposure in the short-term and long-term (0.08 ppm) according to the Indoor Air Quality Guidelines set by the WHO (Zuber et al. 2022; CDC n.d.; Nielsen et al. 2017). Long-term FA exposure in indoor air has been found to be carcinogenic, potentially leading to nasopharyngeal carcinoma and leukemia (Shiraishi 2006; Zuber et al. 2022; CDC n.d.; Nielsen et al. 2017; Matheson et al. 2023). High-quality indoor air cleaners can be utilized to reduce FA levels in the air with various types of air cleaners, such as activated carbon, negative ion and photocatalytic cleaners; however, these cleaners consume vast amount of electrical power (between 39.1 W and 79.2 W), can cause secondary FA pollution, are very expensive (between $147 and $721), and are inadequate for reducing FA concentrations to meet WHO guidelines. This makes them ineffective to use in an anatomy dissection hall (Chen et al. 2007). Students and faculty utilize N95 masks as a precautionary method against the COVID-19 pandemic and wear them even in the anatomy dissection hall; however, N95 masks seem to be ineffectual at reducing FA levels to WHO standards, and hence, they fail to provide any additional benefit against the effects of FA (Chan et al. 2016). Plants affect the levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in indoor environments; thus, they represent a potentially cheaper, non-electricity-consuming and greener solution for improving indoor air quality (Shaham et al. 2003; Peterson et al. 2023). Studies of plants that reduce indoor pollution have recommended that 15 to 18 plants in 6 to 8-inch-diameter containers are required to clean the air in an average of 1,800 square foot houses. There is approximately one plant per 100 square feet of floor space (Dela Cruz et al. 2014). Studies have indicated that the average FA absorption rate of certain plants is 674 micrograms per hour for Spathiphyllum (peace lily) and 1304 micrograms per hour for Dracaena trifasciata/Sansevieria (variegated snake plant) (Wolverton and Wolverton 1993). The FA concentration in the atmosphere is affected by and directly proportional to the temperature and humidity of the air, the correlation coefficient between temperature and emission factors is greater than 0.83, and the correlation coefficient between relative humidity and emission factors is greater than 0.98 (Parthasarathy et al. 2011).

Previous studies have mentioned the usage of potted ornamental plants in the reduction of FA pollution in indoor settings, and the deleterious effects of FA on individuals, especially medical students and teaching faculty in the anatomy dissection hall, no study thus far has dealt with uniting the two, by utilizing a cheap, effective and green way of reducing FA concentration in the anatomy dissection hall.

Methods

Ethical approval

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC 343/2022) Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospitals, Manipal on July 14, 2022. Though the study did not involve cadavers directly, however the specimen storage room was utilized and written informed consent was given by the body donors for teaching and research when they were alive.

Study design and data collection

The study was conducted in the cadaveric specimen storage room in the Anatomy Department, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal. In this study, we used formalin with a standard concentration of 10% formaldehyde solution, prepared according to our department's established preservation protocol. All cadavers were preserved using identical formalin preparation methods to ensure consistency in formaldehyde exposure. The specimen storage room contained 15 preserved cadaveric specimens stored in metal preservation chambers, each measuring approximately 2 m × 1 m × 1.5 m, with a total storage area volume of 21 cubic meters. The preservation chambers utilized 10% buffered formaldehyde solution for specimen maintenance. The traffic into the storage room was restricted during the study period to minimize errors in recording FA levels. The storage room of the anatomy dissection hall has an area of 700 sq feet with two open windows, which were kept closed at all times, and two exhaust fans, which were not switched on during the study period. This setup was chosen to establish baseline measurements without ventilation; in real-world teaching environments, these exhaust fans would typically be operational. The VOC monitor, Forbix Semicon air quality monitor with a detection limit of 0.005 ppm (5 parts per million) ppm, installed in this room was initially used to assess the basal levels of FA fumes in the room. The values were recorded twice daily (at 9:00am and 4:00pm) for two weeks. Following which, 7 potted plants all of a particular plant species were kept in the room. Hence, there was one potted plant for every 100 sq. feet. The three species of plants used for this study were Dracaena trifasciata/Sansevieria (snake plant), Epipremnum aureum (golden pothos), Spathiphyllum (peace lily). We selected these three plant species based on their prior reported capabilities in air purification. Dracaena trifasciata (Snake Plant), Epipremnum aureum (Golden Pothos), and Spathiphyllum (Peace Lily) have been previously documented in scientific literature for their potential to absorb volatile organic compounds (Wolverton and Wolverton 1993). The plants were in uniform pots with a frustum shape, with a top circumference of 79 cm and a bottom diameter of 44 cm. The height of the pot was 25 cm. The pots were kept equidistant from each other at a distance of 25 cm. However, the dimensions of the plants per se were variable. All the potted plants were placed around the cadaveric specimen storage room as seen in Figure 1. The distance between plants and storage units was approximately 50 cm and the plants were centrally positioned in the storage room to ensure uniform distribution designed to ensure uniform distribution and minimal interference with specimen storage. The plants were kept here for 2 weeks, based on practical considerations, and the FA values were recorded twice daily. These potted plants received natural indirect sunlight for ten hours. This study was conducted during the summer season, and the temperature and humidity were noted along with the FA levels. The plants were subsequently removed, and a two-week interval was established before the plants of the next species were transferred to allow the FA concentrations to once again reach basal levels. The daily temperature and humidity were also noted.

038317cc-9842-48d9-b6f8-68e17301457e_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Diagram depicting the storage room with the position of the plants, the cadaveric specimen stored in formalin and the ventilation of the room.

Data analysis

The readings documented were tabulated, and the statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 20.0 (USA). Paired t-tests were used to compare formaldehyde levels with and without plants for each plant species. The P value for each of the plant species was calculated separately to determine whether any of the plants had a statistically significant effect on the FA concentration in the storage room. The P value ranges from 0 to 1, where a value closer to 0 means that there is a good chance of statistical significance, while a value closer to 1 indicates a null hypothesis; i.e., there is no statistical significance.

Results

On observing Figure 2, plotted with the plants across the x-axis and concentration of FA across the y-axis and values from Table 1, the following inference could be made regarding the FA concentration measured in the storage room:

  • 1. When Dracaena trifasciata is present, the concentration in the room was 0.03 ppm less than when there is an absence of the plant.

  • 2. When Epipremnum aureum was present, the concentration in the room was 0.01 ppm greater than that when no Epipremnum aureum was present.

  • 3. When Spathiphyllum is present, the room has 0.03 ppm more than when no Spathiphyllum is present.

038317cc-9842-48d9-b6f8-68e17301457e_figure2.gif

Figure 2. Efficacy of 3 plant species in reducing FA levels in the storage room of the anatomy dissection hall.

(Note: Error bars represent standard deviation (SD)).

Table 1. The average temperature, humidity and FA concentrations with/without the plants.

No plantWith plant
Avg. Temperature (°C)Avg. HumidityAvg. Formaldehyde (ppm)Avg. Temperature (°C)Avg. HumidityAvg. Formaldehyde (ppm)
1. Dracaena trifasciata 33.469%0.3132.869%0.28 (p = 0.06)
2. Epipremnum aureum 31.467%0.2332.572%0.24 (p = 0.02*)
3. Spathiphyllum 27.082%0.0826.385%0.11 (p < 0.01**)

* p < 0.05.

** p < 0.01.

Hence, according to the results obtained, Dracaena trifasciata had the greatest negative effect on FA levels and helped to reduce FA concentration, while Epipremnum aureum and Spathiphyllum had a comparatively different effect in its efficacy of reducing FA levels.

The P value for Dracaena trifasciata was 0.06, that for Epipremnum aureum was 0.02, and that for Spathiphyllum was <0.01.

The regressions of Epipremnum aureum and Spathiphyllum were calculated, and both had nonsignificant increase in formaldehyde levels in the air compared with the absence of plants in the storage room.

Hence, Dracaena trifasciata fails to reject/invalidate the null hypothesis, while Epipremnum aureum and Spathiphyllum reject/invalidate the null hypothesis but have a slight positive effect on the FA level, there was an increase in the FA levels in the storage room, which is contrary to what we were trying to establish.

Additional spatial analysis revealed subtle variations in formaldehyde concentration relative to plant placement. While plants were arranged equidistantly, micro-variations in ambient formaldehyde levels were observed, suggesting potential localized absorption effects that warrant further investigation.

Discussion

Earlier studies conducted by multiple authors such as Teiri et al. (2018), Dela Cruz et al. (2014), Kim et al. (2008) and Wolverton and Wolverton (1993) have shown that potted ornamental plants seem to have a significant negative correlation with the FA levels. Spathiphyllum and Dracaena trifasciata in question have been shown to reduce FA significantly (Wolverton and Wolverton 1993); however, these same results were not reciprocated in this particular study. We did find a decrease in FA levels when Dracaena trifasciata was kept in the storage room; however, this change was not the same for the other 2 species of plants. While the efficacy of the Epipremnum aureum has not been particularly accurately described or reviewed in the literature, it is expected to reduce FA as well. All 3 plants failed to bring the average FA concentration in the storage room to levels deemed safe by WHO standards. However, the average FA levels in the storage room, whether there were any of the 3 plants or no plants at all, satisfied the OSHA standards. A similar result was also observed in previous studies (Gahukar et al. 2014). The weak positive correlation observed might be attributed to complex environmental interactions. Factors such as room temperature (ranging from 26.3-33.4°C), humidity variations (67-85%), and specific room configuration could significantly influence plant performance in formaldehyde absorption.

Temperature and humidity have a positive correlation with FA concentration, as observed in earlier literature (Parthasarathy et al. 2011), which indicates a similar positive correlation. The efficacy of the indoor plants Spathiphyllum, Dracaena trifasciata and Epipremnum aureum in reducing FA levels in ambient air contradicts the findings of earlier studies and can be explained on the basis of the following hypothesis. In previous studies (Teiri et al. 2018; Dela Cruz et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2008; Wolverton and Wolverton 1993), a constant amount of FA was pumped into a chamber; however, in the present study the FA present in the storage room in the anatomy dissection hall was evaluated and we wanted to determine the true efficacy of using potted plants in a real-time scenario. It is also important to note that our study was conducted with the exhaust fans turned off, which was necessary to establish baseline measurements, but differs from normal teaching conditions. Future studies might consider comparing formaldehyde levels with and without ventilation to better simulate actual classroom environments. Humidity and temperature are clearly positively correlated with FA concentration, both in this study and in earlier studies (Parthasarathy et al. 2011). However, the effects of these compounds on plant FA absorption and metabolism have not been determined. During the study period, conducted in the summer season, temperature ranged between 26.3-33.4°C with humidity levels of 67-85%. Movement within the storage room was strictly controlled, maximum 2-3 personnel entries per day, entry duration limited to 5 minutes were the protocols implemented to minimize air disturbance and maintain experimental integrity.

These controlled conditions aim to minimize external variables that might influence formaldehyde concentration and plant absorption capabilities. Future studies could explore how varying environmental parameters impact plant-mediated formaldehyde reduction. Previous studies (Dela Cruz et al. 2014) have indicated the use of 1 plant per 100 sq. feet, which is the rationale behind putting 7 plants in the 700 sq. feet storage room, the conditions in the earlier study (controlled environment with known, constant quantities of FA) and this particular study (a real-time environment) differed, and a greater number of plants could impact the results of the study in a radically different way. While utilizing indoor plants for air purification, we should acknowledge potential health risks associated with certain species. Epipremnum aureum and Spathiphyllum contain calcium oxalate, which can cause mild toxicity if ingested. To mitigate risks plants should be positioned away from direct human contact areas and warning signs should be placed near plant locations on the inhibition of ingestion along with regular monitoring ensuring minimal risk to students and faculty.

Studies conducted for longer duration could yield different results, as potted ornamental plants become sensitized to FA and hence metabolize and remove more FA over time if they are constantly exposed to it (Wolverton and Wolverton 1993).

Considering the ill effects which long term exposure to FA could lead to as an occupational hazard (Onyeka et al. 2018); causing decreased pulmonary functions in faculty and medical students exposed to FA during anatomy dissection (Homwutthiwong and Ongwandee 2017) we hope to bring about a change in the working environment naturally. We plan to continue this study bearing the confounding factors in mind, scaling up the number of potted plants and hope that we could get an ideal environment where FA concentrations would not affect our health and learning would continue as usual. Researchers can explore the potential beneficial effects of indoor plants on reducing atmospheric pollutants, namely, FA, by such cost-effective methods. By delving deeper into this field and obtaining an ideal number and variety of plants for economically improving the air quality, especially in places with maximum exposure to FA, we hope to bring a positive change to those exposed to FA.

Conclusion

The efficacy of using indoor plants for reducing FA levels needs to be further explored since studies conducted in ambient air are rare, unlike prior studies conducted in controlled environments. While our initial study used a 14-day exposure period, future research should explore longer-term plant interactions with formaldehyde to comprehensively understand their air purification potential as well as increase the number of potted plants utilized. Additionally, more accurate formaldehyde measurement techniques should be employed, as conventional VOC meters may have limitations in sensitivity and specificity for formaldehyde detection. Future research should also compare scenarios with exhaust fans operational versus non-operational to better simulate actual teaching conditions. Future studies with expanded plant varieties, and implementing longer exposure periods (3-6 months) as well as investigating environmental variable impacts on plant air purification efficiency would enhance indoor air management.

Ethics and consent statement

The protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC 343/2022) Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospitals, Manipal on July 14, 2022. Though the study did not involve cadavers directly, however the specimen storage room was utilized and written informed consent was given by the body donors for teaching and research when they were alive.

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2024
Comment
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Joshi AG, Punja D and Punja R. Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.152489.3)
NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 3
VERSION 3
PUBLISHED 22 Jul 2025
Revised
Views
1
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Aug 2025
Choy Ker Woon, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia 
Approved
VIEWS 1
I have made recommendation ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Woon CK. Reviewer Report For: Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.185228.r399863)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 2
VERSION 2
PUBLISHED 27 Nov 2024
Revised
Views
7
Cite
Reviewer Report 04 Feb 2025
Choy Ker Woon, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 7
1) Is there any significant differences between control and experimental group? Include the p value and its significant symbols in the table. 

2) Under data analysis, state the type of the test done.

3) ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Woon CK. Reviewer Report For: Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.175209.r348114)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 05 Aug 2025
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    05 Aug 2025
    Author Response
    Reviewer comment:
    Is there any significant differences between control and experimental group? Include the p value and its significant symbols in the table.
    Response: We appreciate this suggestion and have ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 05 Aug 2025
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    05 Aug 2025
    Author Response
    Reviewer comment:
    Is there any significant differences between control and experimental group? Include the p value and its significant symbols in the table.
    Response: We appreciate this suggestion and have ... Continue reading
Views
11
Cite
Reviewer Report 03 Jan 2025
Yasar Sajjad, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 11
The idea to test the indoor plants for their removal efficiency in real environment is appealing. The experiment was conducted carefully, and the article is also well written. I am concerned about the reliability of technique used to measure the ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Sajjad Y. Reviewer Report For: Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.175209.r348122)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 05 Aug 2025
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    05 Aug 2025
    Author Response
    Reviewer Comment:
    The idea to test the indoor plants for their removal efficiency in real environment is appealing. The experiment was conducted carefully, and the article is also well written. ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 05 Aug 2025
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    05 Aug 2025
    Author Response
    Reviewer Comment:
    The idea to test the indoor plants for their removal efficiency in real environment is appealing. The experiment was conducted carefully, and the article is also well written. ... Continue reading
Views
8
Cite
Reviewer Report 12 Dec 2024
Kumar Satish Ravi, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttarakhand, India 
Approved
VIEWS 8
Authors have addressed my ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ravi KS. Reviewer Report For: Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.175209.r343897)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2024
Views
22
Cite
Reviewer Report 14 Nov 2024
Ranganath Vallabhajosyula, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Singapore,, Singapore 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 22
The authors have conducted an interesting study on role of indoor plants in reducing the formaldehyde levels in the cadaveric labs.  Interesting though, there are few questions, that authors would need to address.

Introduction:  The authors have ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Vallabhajosyula R. Reviewer Report For: Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.167255.r333503)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 27 Nov 2024
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    27 Nov 2024
    Author Response
    We sincerely appreciate the reviewer's thoughtful and constructive feedback, which has provided valuable insights for improving our manuscript.

    Reviewer Comment on Introduction:
    Response: We have added the details on ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 27 Nov 2024
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    27 Nov 2024
    Author Response
    We sincerely appreciate the reviewer's thoughtful and constructive feedback, which has provided valuable insights for improving our manuscript.

    Reviewer Comment on Introduction:
    Response: We have added the details on ... Continue reading
Views
29
Cite
Reviewer Report 05 Nov 2024
Kumar Satish Ravi, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttarakhand, India 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 29
Review Feedback on Manuscript

Title: “Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels”

This study presents an interesting ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Ravi KS. Reviewer Report For: Can indoor plants reduce formaldehyde levels in the anatomy dissection hall? A study to evaluate the practicality of using plants in reducing formaldehyde levels [version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2025, 13:1249 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.167255.r333509)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 03 Dec 2024
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    03 Dec 2024
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank you for the constructive feedback and have tried to address the concerns as pointed. 
    1. Description of Formalin/Preservative:
    Response: We have added a more detailed explanation of ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 03 Dec 2024
    Rohini Punja, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India
    03 Dec 2024
    Author Response
    We sincerely thank you for the constructive feedback and have tried to address the concerns as pointed. 
    1. Description of Formalin/Preservative:
    Response: We have added a more detailed explanation of ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (0)

Version 3
VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2024
Comment
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.