Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research Culture

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this gateway (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this gateway
Home Gateways Research on Research, Policy & Culture
1-20 of 115 ARTICLES
Previous Next
 in 
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155832.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Fostering open science and responsible research practices: A pre-post study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Jaisson Cenci, Marcos Britto Correa, Lex Bouter, David Moher, Ewald Bronkhorst, Marina Christ Franco, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci, Marie Charlotte Huysmans, Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Peer Reviewers Juan-José Boté-Vericad; Joachim Schöpfel; Sarahanne M Field; Priya Silverstein
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 20 Oct 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.170019.1
Research Article metrics
Gender equity in scientific production in Peru and Colombia: reality or utopia in public universities?
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved]
Félix José Colina Ysea, Nathalí Pantigoso Leython, Irene Roxana Abad Lezama, Gleny Secibel Jara Llanos, Soledad Mirella Chávez Campo, Eddy Richard Salvador Guarcaya, Myriam Esther Ortiz Padilla, Yanina Yulieth Nieto Miranda
Peer Reviewers Miguel Angulo-Giraldo
PUBLISHED 17 Oct 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154069.4
Systematic Review metrics
Revised
Integration of Democratic Values ​​in Natural Sciences Education: a Review of the Literature of the Last 50 Years
[version 4; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Santiago Monsalve-Silva, Gabriel Otalvaro-García, Laura Sofía Cajica Velandia, Ana Dolores Vargas Sánchez
Peer Reviewers Genç Osman ilhan; Anissa Lestari Kadiyono; John Mart Elesio
  • Funder
  • Universidad de La Sabana
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 12 Sep 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157778.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Foundational Competencies and Responsibilities of a Research Software Engineer: Current State and Suggestions for Future Directions
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Florian Goth, Renato Alves, Matthias Braun, Leyla Jael Castro, Gerasimos Chourdakis, Simon Christ, Jeremy Cohen, Stephan Druskat, Fredo Erxleben, Jean-Noël Grad, Magnus Hagdorn, Toby Hodges, Guido Juckeland, Dominic Kempf, Anna-Lena Lamprecht, Jan Linxweiler, Frank Löffler, Michele Martone, Moritz Schwarzmeier, Heidi Seibold, Jan Philipp Thiele, Harald von Waldow, Samantha Wittke
Peer Reviewers Miranda Mundt; Uwe Schmitt
  • Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking
  • Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 08 Sep 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.151211.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
‘What seems to be missing is actual reality’ Why are postdocs (and closely related researchers) hesitant to engage with non-research-focused professional development opportunities?
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Mollie Etheridge, Jessica Hampton, Becky Ioppolo, Lara Abel, Noam Tal-Perry, Katherine Dawson, Marie Collier, Zoe Matthews, Kate Murray, Sylvia Osborn, Liz Simmonds, Steven Wooding
Peer Reviewers Santiago Schnell; Christine Teelken; Maresi Nerad and Cecilia Bibbo
  • Funders
  • Research England
  • Wellcome Trust
  • University of Cambridge
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 19 Aug 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.161819.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The most prevalent perceived barriers to sharing research data at the point of manuscript acceptance in health and life sciences: a survey at the University of Bristol
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Rrita Bajraktari, Fiona Booth, Marcus Munafo, Nicholas Beazley-Long
Peer Reviewers Juan-José Boté-Vericad; Stefan Reichmann; Anna Catharina Vieira Armond; Olavo B. Amaral and Gabriel G. Costa
  • Funder
  • Philanthropic donation from Professor John Climax
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 15 Aug 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.167245.1
Research Article metrics AWAITING PEER REVIEW
It’s complicated: staff experiences of academic integrity at a Mauritian university
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Annemarie Davis
Peer Reviewers Invited
  • Funder
  • University of South Africa
PUBLISHED 08 Aug 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.164794.1
Research Article metrics
From Recruitment to Retirement: Research Infrastructure Staff Views on the Diversification of Scientific Career Paths at Universities in Sweden in 2024
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
Kristen Schroeder, Julia Fernández-Rodríguez, Annika Jenmalm-Jensen, Josefin Lundgren-Gawell, Sara Sandin, Charlotte Stadler, Jessica M. Lindvall
Peer Reviewers Stefano Gaburro; Julián D. Cortés; Emma Karoune; Fran Bagenal
PUBLISHED 04 Jul 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146108.2
Brief Report metrics
Revised
Are Narrative CVs contributing towards shifting research culture? Workshop Report from the 2023 Recognition and Rewards Festival
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Noémie Aubert Bonn, James Peter Morris, Sean Sapcariu, Karen Stroobants
Peer Reviewers Maria Pietilä; Simon Kolstoe; Marianne Gauffriau; Ruth Schmidt
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 19 Jun 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160170.1
Research Article metrics AWAITING PEER REVIEW
Political bias in historiography - an experimental investigation of preferences for publication as a function of political orientation
[version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]
Louis Schiekiera, Helen Niemeyer
Peer Reviewers Invited
  • Funder
  • Berlin University Alliance
PUBLISHED 24 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154665.3
Brief Report metrics
Revised
Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Amanda Blatch-Jones, Cherish Boxall, Katie Meadmore
Peer Reviewers Junwen Luo; Santiago Vasco-Morales; Mario COCCIA; Adrian Barnett
  • Funder
  • This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Coordinating Centre (NIHRCC), based at the University of Southampton, through its Research on Research programme of work. The views and opinions expressed in the discussion are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health and Social Care. The NIHRCC had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 06 Mar 2025
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.143013.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
An international, cross-sectional survey of preprint attitudes among biomedical researchers
[version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 5 approved with reservations]
Jeremy Y. Ng, Valerie Chow, Lucas J. Santoro, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh Pirshahid, Kelly D. Cobey, David Moher
Peer Reviewers Artemis Chaleplioglou; Kimberly Powell; Luka Ursić; Amanda Blatch-Jones; Shelly Melissa Pranic; Andrew Tattersall
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 04 Nov 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.147599.3
Systematic Review metrics
Revised
A scoping review on what constitutes a good research culture
[version 3; peer review: 4 approved]
Amanda Jane Blatch-Jones, Kay Lakin, Sarah Thomas
Peer Reviewers Steven De Peuter; Elisabeth Grey; Elizabeth Gadd; Stephen Curry
  • Funder
  • Research England
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 14 Oct 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154846.1
Research Article metrics
More value and less waste in research on primary cam morphology and its natural history: a qualitative interview study of stakeholders' perspectives
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
H Paul Dijkstra, Sean McAuliffe, Jolanda Boersma, Mike Clarke, Karim Khan, Sion Glyn-Jones, Trisha Greenhalgh
Peer Reviewers Samantha Bunzli; Jinchi Tang
PUBLISHED 19 Sep 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.140810.2
Method Article metrics
Revised
The SCOPE framework – implementing ideals of responsible research assessment
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Laura Himanen, Erica Conte, Marianne Gauffriau, Tanja Strøm, Baron Wolf, Elizabeth Gadd
Peer Reviewers Sven E Hug; Dr Maria Alejandra Pinero de Plaza, PhD
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 17 May 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.127026.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Online marketing and brand awareness for HEI: A review and bibliometric analysis
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Sailaja Bohara, Vashali Bisht, Pradeep Suri, Diksha Panwar, Jyoti Sharma
Peer Reviewers Sanjib Biswas; Arun Vijay Subbarayalu
  • Funder
  • No funding has been taken for this research
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 13 May 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148290.1
Opinion Article metrics
Monitoring Open Science as transformative change: Towards a systemic framework
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Ismael Rafols, Ingeborg Meijer, Jordi Molas-Gallart
Peer Reviewers Hans De Jonge; Francesca Di Donato
PUBLISHED 23 Apr 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.127563.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The transparency of quantitative empirical legal research published in highly ranked law journals (2018–2020): an observational study
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Jason Chin, Kathryn Zeiler, Natali Dilevski, Alex O Holcombe, Rosemary Gatfield-Jeffries, Ruby Bishop, Simine Vazire, Sarah Schiavone
Peer Reviewers Antica Culina; Stefanie Mueller; Rob Heirene
  • Funders
  • Boston University
  • University of Sydney
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Mar 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.148189.1
Editorial metrics NOT PEER REVIEWED
F1000Research collaboration with the Research on Research Registry & Hub
[version 1; peer review: not peer reviewed]
Ksenia Crane, Rebecca Hill, Hazel Church, RoR Registry & Hub Group, Alejandra Recio-Saucedo
  • Funder
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
PUBLISHED 29 Feb 2024
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142411.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Mike Perkins, Jasper Roe
Peer Reviewers Brenda M Stoesz; Mary Davis; Stephen Gow; Salim Razı
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 16 Jan 2024
1-20 of 115 ARTICLES
Previous Next
Gateway Areas
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new
Our Links
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.
Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.