Research on Research, Policy & Culture

Research on Research, Policy & Culture

track_changes Track Tracking Be alerted when new articles are added in this gateway (manage your tracking alerts via your account) Stop tracking this gateway
221-240 of 288 ARTICLES
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15256.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
What is a predatory journal? A scoping review
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Monica Berger; Johann Mouton; Joanna Chataway
  • Funder
  • University of Ottawa, Research Chair
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 23 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13030.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Positive bias for European men in peer reviewed applications for faculty position at Karolinska Institutet
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Inés Sánchez de Madariaga; Stephen A Gallo
  • Funder
  • Karolinska Institutet
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 14 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15619.1
Research Article metrics
Exploring machine learning: A bibliometric general approach using Citespace
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Sally Ellingson; Chaomei Chen
  • Funder
  • Universidad del Cauca
PUBLISHED 10 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14488.3
Research Article metrics
Revised
Missing the point: are journals using the ideal number of decimal places?
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Tim J. Cole; David J. Winter
  • Funder
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 10 Aug 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15385.1
Opinion Article metrics
Shaping the Future of Research: A perspective from early career researchers in Vancouver, Canada
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers Michael Hendricks; Holly Witteman
PUBLISHED 16 Jul 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15517.1
Opinion Article metrics
Time to really share real-world data?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Sajan Khosla; David Madigan; Laurie A. Tomlinson
PUBLISHED 11 Jul 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15154.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
A cross-sectional study of the use and effectiveness of the Individual Development Plan among doctoral students
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Christopher L. Pickett; Jessica K Polka; Zeba Wunderlich
  • Funder
  • University of Kentucky
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 05 Jul 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15334.1
Opinion Article metrics
Ten considerations for open peer review
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Richard Smith; Darko Hren
  • Funders
  • Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth / COMET program
  • European Commission
PUBLISHED 29 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15436.1
Research Article metrics
Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Larry Peiperl; David Mellor; Anisa Rowhani-Farid
PUBLISHED 27 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15106.1
Research Article metrics
Bibliometrics of the 100 most-cited articles on refugee populations
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers Syed Raza Shah; Samy A Azer
PUBLISHED 22 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15078.1
Opinion Article metrics
A new paradigm for the scientific enterprise: nurturing the ecosystem
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Jonathan P. Tennant; Gary S. McDowell; Cameron Neylon
PUBLISHED 20 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12344.2
Opinion Article metrics
Revised
Best practice data life cycle approaches for the life sciences
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Johannes Starlinger; Sven Nahnsen
  • Funders
  • Bioplatforms Australia
  • University of Melbourne
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 04 Jun 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12538.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
The unhappy postdoc: a survey based study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers Navid Ghaffarzadegan and Ran Xu; Nick Riddiford; Gary S. McDowell; Jennifer M. Miller
  • Funder
  • Self-funded
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 02 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.14600.1
Opinion Article metrics
The need for a new science, technology and medicine University in the Middle East: Carving the future
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers Sammy Ohene; George Perry
PUBLISHED 26 Apr 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13789.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Classification of processes involved in sharing individual participant data from clinical trials
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers Florian Naudet; Matthew R. Sydes; Matthias Löbe
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 20 Apr 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11917.2
Review metrics
Revised
What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences?
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Adrian Barnett; Aled Morgan Edwards
  • Funder
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 27 Mar 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13477.2
Research Article metrics
Revised
Badges for sharing data and code at Biostatistics: an observational study
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Gustav Nilsonne; Bastian Greshake
  • Funder
  • Queensland University of Technology
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 07 Mar 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.13760.2
Correspondence metrics
Revised
Improving the biomedical research literature: insights from authors’ editors can help journal editors define and refine their core competencies
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Joy Burrough-Boenisch; Na Luo
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 21 Feb 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12496.3
Research Article metrics
Revised
The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers Yaso Kunaratnam; Adrian Barnett
  • Funder
  • Department for International Development, UK Government
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 16 Jan 2018
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
Review metrics
Revised
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers David Moher; Virginia Barbour
  • Funder
  • Horizon 2020
LATEST VERSION PUBLISHED 29 Nov 2017
221-240 of 288 ARTICLES
Gateway Areas
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.