Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research on Research, Policy & Culture
Research Note
metrics
Revised
Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Hans Lund;
Mona Nasser
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Open laboratory notebooks: good for science, good for society, good for scientists
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Matthew H. Todd, Edwin Tse, Marat Korsik and Mathamsanqa Bhebhe;
Lara M. Mangravite;
Jean-Baptiste Poline
- Funders
- Eshelman Institute for Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Innovative Medicines Initiative
- Leicester Institute of Chemical and Structural Biology
- Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
- Canada Foundation for Innovation
- Genome Canada
- Wellcome Trust
- Huntington's Disease Society of America
Research Article
metrics
The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: a review of medical journals
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Ernesto Roldan-Valadez;
Suneet Sood;
Deeb N. Salem;
Sung-Tae Hong
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Catherine Mathews;
Richard Lehman;
David Henry and Paulina Stehlik
- Funders
- National Institute for Health Research
- Research Council of Norway
Opinion Article
metrics
What is reproducibility?
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Steven N. Goodman;
C. Glenn Begley;
Ksenija Bazdaric
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
Sharing health research data – the role of funders in improving the impact
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Phaik-Yeong Cheah;
Amanda Blatch-Jones;
Keith C. Norris
Opinion Article
metrics
The principles of tomorrow's university
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Lucy Montgomery;
Olivia Guest
- Funders
- Elsevier Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Use and effectiveness of the Individual Development Plan among postdoctoral researchers: findings from a cross-sectional study
[version 2; peer review: 3 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Jonathan S. Wiest and Chanelle Case Borden;
Tammy R. L. Collins;
Adriana Bankston;
Kristen L. W. Walton;
Richard McGee
- Funders
- University of Texas
- University of Kentucky
Opinion Article
metrics
Publishing peer review materials
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Jessica K Polka;
Tony Ross-Hellauer
- Funders
- U.S. National Library of Medicine
- Wellcome Trust
Opinion Article
metrics
Revised
The Congress Impact Factor: A proposal from board members of the World Society of Emergency Surgeons.it (WSES) and Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC)
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Francesco Azzaroli;
Luca Luzzi
Research Article
metrics
Negative/null result
Revised
Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations? A cross-sectional study.
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Jonathan Shepherd and Jeremy C. Wyatt;
Shahar Avin and Steven Wooding
- Funder
- National Health and Medical Research Council
Review
metrics
The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Jonathan P. Tennant;
Aaron Barlow
- Funder
- Open Society Foundations
Research Article
metrics
Raising the status of software in research: A survey-based evaluation of the Software Sustainability Institute Fellowship Programme
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Colin C. Venters;
Dan Sholler;
Lois Curfman McInnes
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Research Article
metrics
Peer Reviewers
Monica Berger;
Johann Mouton;
Joanna Chataway
- Funder
- University of Ottawa, Research Chair
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Positive bias for European men in peer reviewed applications for faculty position at Karolinska Institutet
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Inés Sánchez de Madariaga;
Stephen A Gallo
- Funder
- Karolinska Institutet
Research Article
metrics
Exploring machine learning: A bibliometric general approach using Citespace
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Sally Ellingson;
Chaomei Chen
- Funder
- Universidad del Cauca
Research Article
metrics
Revised
Missing the point: are journals using the ideal number of decimal places?
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]
Peer Reviewers
Tim J. Cole;
David J. Winter
- Funder
- National Health and Medical Research Council
Opinion Article
metrics
Shaping the Future of Research: A perspective from early career researchers in Vancouver, Canada
[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
Peer Reviewers
Michael Hendricks;
Holly Witteman
Opinion Article
metrics
Time to really share real-world data?
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Sajan Khosla;
David Madigan;
Laurie A. Tomlinson
Research Article
metrics
Revised
A cross-sectional study of the use and effectiveness of the Individual Development Plan among doctoral students
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Peer Reviewers
Christopher L. Pickett;
Jessica K Polka;
Zeba Wunderlich
- Funder
- University of Kentucky
Call for Papers: AI in Academic Research open_in_new